Dr. Alex E. Blazer | Course Site | Syllabus |
In Class Activities | Peer Response | |
Paper 1 | ||
Paper 2 | Annotated Bibliography | Paper 3 |
Consuming (Pop) Culture
English 102-49: Intermediate College Writing
Spring 2004, TR 2:30-3:45PM, Bingham Humanities Bldg 106
In "Sex, Lies, and Advertising," Gloria Steinem describes an editorial situation in which advertisers attempted to control editorial judgment and content of the magazines in which they placed their ads. Today, we will have our own debate on this topic. Divide into three groups and spend approximately 20 minutes preparing your position for the debate. Here are the groups' positions:
The goal of the informal writing assignments is to get you to think actively about the readings and write analytically about popular culture (become a critical consumer rather than a blind indulger.) These short assignments of approximately 300-500 words will also prepare you to write the longer, formal papers. Approximately once per week, you will be asked to respond to an essay or some element of popular culture. Although you will write in class or email a couple of responses to me, you will type most responses and hand them in at the beginning of class.
News Satire: read at least two issues or watch at least a week's worth of programs | |
The Daily Show with Jon Stewart [cable] | Ben Casabella |
Le Show [internet radio] |
|
The Onion [internet news] |
Casey Crawford |
Media Analysis: read at least 2 issues or watch/listen to at least 2 programs | |
On the Media from NPR [internet radio] |
|
Fox News Watch [cable] |
Brad Ellis |
24-Hour Cable: watch at least four hours at various times over the course of a week, paying particular attention to the punditry shows and the daytime filler |
|
Cable News Network (CNN) [cable] |
Brian S. Ford |
Fox News Channel [cable] |
Dierdre Thomas |
MSNBC [cable] |
Lori Cissell |
Morning News: watch at least two full programs | |
C-SPAN's Washington Journal [cable] | Erin Yates |
ABC's Good Morning America | Mike Webber |
CBS's The Early Show | Whitney Cecil |
NBC's The Today Show | Shaliza Edge |
Local News: watch a week of programs |
|
ABC | Betsy Wolfe |
CBS |
Holly Clark |
Fox | Amy Hedges Sarah Riche |
NBC |
Varina Sausman |
Newspapers: read a couple of issues | |
Louisville Courier Journal |
Matt Rasche |
Louisville Eccentric Observer |
Evan Fedders |
New York Times | Jordan Greenwell |
USA Today | Dottie Copeland |
Magazines: read a couple of issues | |
Newsweek | Maegan Smith |
Radio News | |
NPR (Morning Edition or All Things Considered) |
Satire of the American Dream | |
American Beauty (Sam Mendes, 1999) | Whitney Cecil |
Boiler Room (Ben Younger, 2000) | Erin Yates |
Can't Hardly Wait (Harry Elfont and Deborah Kaplan, 1998) | Hope Fothergill |
A Christmas Story (Bob Clark, 1983) | Sarah Riche |
Clueless (Amy Heckerling, 1995) |
Casey Crawford Dierdre Thomas |
Fight Club (David Fincher, 1999) |
Matt Rasche |
Glengarry Glen Ross (James Foley, 1992) |
|
She's All That (Robert Iscove, 1999) | Maegan Smith |
Vanilla Sky (Cameron Crowe, 2001) | Evan Fedders |
Television and Film Satire |
|
Cecil B. Demented (John Waters, 2000) |
Lori Cissell |
Death to Smoochie (Danny DeVito, 2002) | Jordan Greenwell |
Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back (Kevin Smith, 2001) | Brad Ellis |
Leave It to Beaver (Andy Cadiff, 1997) | Betsy Wolfe |
Man Bites Dog (Rémy Belvaux, André Bonzol, and Benôt Poelvoorde, 1992) |
|
Pleasantville (Gary Ross, 1998) |
Ben Casabella Brian S. Ford |
The Running Man (Paul Michael Glaser, 1987) |
Holly Clark |
Series 7: The Contender (Daniel Minahan, 2000) |
Varina Sausman |
Trekkies (Roger Nygard, 1999) |
|
The Truman Show (Peter Weir, 1998) |
Shaliza Edge |
News Satire |
|
Broadcast News (James L. Brooks, 1987) | |
Citizen Kane (Orson Wells, 1941) |
|
Natural Born Killers (Oliver Stone, 1994) | Mike Webber |
Network (Sidney Lumet, 1976) |
|
To Die For (Gas Van Sant, 1995) |
Dottie Copeland |
Tomorrow Never Dies (Roger Spottiswoode, 1997) |
Robert Schaefer |
Wag the Dog (Barry Levinson, 1997) | Amy Hedges |
You will be given the opportunity to revise your first two formal papers based upon not only my comments but your peer's comments as well. You will provide constructive criticism to three or four other members of the class as will they to you. Writers should therefore bring enough copies of the first draft of your paper for me and your group members.
Length: Write one response (250 words minimum) for each of your fellow group member's paper
Due: All written peer responses are due on the date and time that your peer group meets. Peer responders will give their peer response, and writers will turn in those responses to the professor with Draft 2.
Use the following issues to help you to formulate your 250 word response to each peer's paper. Even if you find the paper good, you should still comment on these issues. You can always engage a conversation with the writer about how you're analyzing the issue differently, for that dialogue can also help the writer in the revision process.
All peer groups will meet Thursday, April 4.
Length: Write one response (250 words minimum) for each of your fellow group member's paper.
Due: all written peer responses are due on the date and time that your peer group meets. Peer responders will give their peer response, and writers will turn in those responses to the professor with Draft 2.
Use the following issues to help you to formulate your 250 word response to each peer's paper. Even if you find the paper good, you should still comment on these issues. Don't be vague; talk specifically about particular ideas and analyses. You can always engage a conversation with the writer about how you're analyzing the issue differently, for that dialogue can also help the writer in the revision process.
In the previous three informal writing assignments, you made initial summaries of authors' arguments about the American consumerist world view and did your own semiotic analysis of an advertisement selling such a good. The goal of the first paper is for you to fully enter into the debate on consumerism by rigorously summarizing one of the essays we've read in class. Choose an author whose argument you wish to either expand upon or refute. In either case, your paper should summarize, fairly and accurately, the author's argument. Evaluate that argument: analyze and criticize, affirm and interrogate, but always be fair to the author's argument. Finally, your paper should provide your own perspective, your own argument (analysis and ideas) by either agreeing with the essay but furthering its point with your own ideas, or disagreeing with the essay and offering counterargument of your own.
You will write two drafts of this paper: first, an ungraded draft that will be responded to by me and your peers (see peer response guidelines), and second, a final, graded draft that revises the first draft.
In the first paper, you summarized a writer's argument and then provided your own evaluation of the subject. In the second paper, you will provide your own analysis first and foremost, and use two authors' essays to support your argument. Choose a specific television program or news source and then analyze that particular program and its genre. Your essay must utilize two articles to help it prove its point, one that we've read in our textbook and one that you yourself find using the library.
The outside article, which you can find using the information gained from our library day and this research handout, should be from a scholarly book chapter, a scholarly journal (published four times per year and consisting of writers who are academics in the field), or a reputable magazie (choose a high quality, substantial, argumentative and feature length article; editorials, reviews, and short essays are not acceptable). Finally, note that the point of this essay is not to summarize and evaluate others' essays, as you did in the first paper, but rather to construct your own analysis of a television or news program and use others' work to support that analysis.
For example, you could discuss issues of reality in Newlyweds and reality tv in general by using the Bissell article and one other article that you find through your own research. Or, you could discuss issues of hard and soft news on the 5:00 o'clock WAVE 3 broadcast by using the Rapping article and one other article that you find through your own research. With nine articles and innumerable television programs and news sources, the possibilities are rich.
You will write two drafts of this paper: first, an ungraded draft that will be responded to by me and your peers (note that the peer response issues and groups are different for this paper: see peer response guidelines), and second, a final, graded draft that revises the first draft.
An annotated bibliography is a list of secondary sources that includes summaries of those materials. A full two weeks before your final paper is due, you will compose an annotated bibliography of the research materials that you might use in Paper 3. Use this research handout to guide your search.
In the first paper, you summarized and evaluated a single article on pop culture consumerism while in the second paper, you used two articles to back up your own analysis of a television show or news outline. In the third paper, you will analayze and research a topic of your choosing (but not one you previously wrote a formal paper on) from any part of the course. You must use at least four research sources to help support your analysis of an issue regarding popular culture. Our three units on the American dream of consumerism; the news; and television, film, and literature have covered a broad range of issues in popular culture; and so you have many issues to choose from. I suggest you clear your topic with me before beginning your annotated bibliography.