Assignments
Popular Culture
English 102-28: Intermediate College Writing
Spring 2006, MW: 2:00-3:15PM, Bingham Humanities Bldg 221 / 104
In Class Activities
1. Cult-Speak
Kelle Lasn and Richard Fox argue that our culture and our minds is pervaded, if not invaded by advertising. This in-class activity is designed to help us judge for ourselves, as well as to get to know fellow class members. Break into groups of two or three. Open a Microsoft Word document, type your group members names in it, and then save it to the desktop as your group members last names (for instance, Doe & Smith.doc). Spend 10 minutes brainstorming the following three lists, and then upload you saved response to Blackboard > Groups > In Class Activity 1 - Cult-Speak > File Exchange:
- List all the ads that you've seen or heard in the last week.
- List all of the media that you've read, watched, or listened to in the last week (tv, radio, film, internet, etc.)
- List all of the media that you've read, watched, or listened to in the last week that had absolutely no advertising involvement.
2. Reading Scholarly Articles
Until this point, we've been reading short essays designed for a general audience.
As you research your second and third formal papers, you will come across and
use scholarly articles, which are articles written by academic experts in diverse
fields of study for those interested in that particular field. Sometimes these
articles use specialized language and may be more "wordy" than you're used
to reading. Don't be turned off by the language; use your ability to spot thesis
statements and topic sentences to read these articles as you would any other.
Today's activity is designed to acclimate you to such articles by cutting to
the quick of the core issues of a special interest article. Even
academics are interested in reality television,
and Tom Bissell and Jan Jagodozinki offer two readings on the phenomenon, one
literary and one psychoanalytical, respectively.
Divide into groups of three or four and submit a collective response to to
the following questions to Blackboard > Groups > In Class Activity 2 - Reading Scholarly Articles >
File Exchange.
If you are assigned Bissell's article, answer these questions:
- How does Bissell define reality?
- Why does Bissell like and dislike reality
tv?
- What do Nazis have to do with the discussion of reality and reality tv?
If your are assigned Jagodozinki's article, answer these questions:
- How does Jagodozinki define reality and the Real?
- To what perverse desires does Jagodozinki believe reality tv appeals?
- What does totalitarianism and The Truman Show have to do with Jagodozinki’s
discussion of reality and reality tv?
3. Library Research
In this in class activity, you will practice conducting research using the
UofL Library system. You should have two windows open. First, open a new
document in Microsoft Word and save it to the desktop. Second, open a web browser
and browse to the Composition Research
Methods handout. You're ready to begin
the in class activity.
- Choose any article that we've read so far (but which you didn't write your
first paper on) and write down its thesis or controlling idea.
- Compose a list of key terms and key words related to the article.
- Using the various library databases discussed in the Composition
Research Methods handout, find one scholarly book or book chapter,
one scholarly journal article, one magazine article, and one newspaper
article on your practice research topic.
- As you find those sources, copy and paste all of their information in
the Word document.
- When you're done, save your work to disk or Blackboard > Groups
> In Class Activity 3 - Library Research > File Exchange. You will be
using this file during our next class for an in-class activity on MLA citation
format.
4. MLA Citation Style
During the last in class activity, you copied the information for four potential
research sources for your second paper. Today, you will put that research data
into correct MLA citation format.
- Divide into groups of two or three.
- Download and open all of your group's research files from Blackboard > Groups > In
Class Activity 3 - Library Research > File Exchange.
- Copy all of your group's research into one new Word document and save it
to the desktop.
- Download and open our MLA citation style
handout.
- Use the MLA citation style handout to translate all of your group's raw
data to MLA style. When you are finished, upload your file to Blackboard > Groups > In
Class Activity 4 - MLA Citation Style > File Exchange.
5. Rap and Hip-Hop Debate
Today, we're going to debate the issue of rap music and hip-hop culture using August's "Hip-Hop Nation: There's More to Rap than Just Rhythms and Rhymes" and Jamilah's "The Miseducation of Hip-Hop" to help our conversation. The broad question that defines the debate is: "Do rap and hip-hop have positive or negative effects on their listeners, community, and the popular culture at large?"
- Divide into four groups: moderators, pro-rap, anti-rap, and judges.
- Each group will have 30-35 minutes to prepare for the debate.
- Those in the moderator group should create a series of written questions based on the two articles (quote the articles where appropriate) and their own examples and understanding of the phenomena.
- Those in the pro-rap group should create a written series of arguments that advocate the positive nature of rap by specifically finding, quoting, and using arguments in the two articles as well as their own examples.
- Those in the anti-rap group should create a written series of arguments that criticize the negative nature of rap by specifically finding, quoting, and using arguments in the two articles as well as their own examples.
- Judges should create their own written pro vs con list by mining the articles for positive and negative effects of rap.
- During the debate, each group will have one minute to make an opening statement, then moderators will pose a series of questions that each side will answer. Judges will determine a) how well each side articulated the positions held in the articles, b) how well the groups posed their own analyses, and c) which side won the debate.
6. Alex Shakar, The Savage Girl
Day One: Monday, April 10
This weekend, your read the first 95 pages of Alex Shakar's The Savage Girl and wrote an informal response on one of the main characters. Today, we'll begin our discussion of the novel after a 20 minute group activity designed to commence your thinking about other characters and possible meanings of the text. Divide into groups of no more than four, complete the following activity in Word, and upload your response to Blackboard > Groups > In Class Activity 6 - Savage Girl > File Exchange.
- Do a brief character sketch of the character your group is assigned: Ursula Van Urden, Ivy Van Urden, Javier or Delreal, or Chas Lacouture.
- Write down three quotes (and their page numbers) that your group found simply humorous or thematically significant.
- Some of the novel's subjects include trendspotting, children, advertising, art, individuality, consumerism, and savagery. Describe the issues and conflicts surrounding a couple of these topics.
Day Two: Wednesday, April 12
Now that you have read two-thirds of the novel, let's recap what's happened and focus on a major symbol and motif. Break into groups of no more than four, answer the following questions, and save your work to Blackboard > Groups > In Class Activity 6 - Savage Girl > File Exchange.
- What happens from page 96-193? Provide a brief three or four sentence summary of the major events.
- Postirony and paradessence become recurring ideas, or motifs, in the first two-thirds of the novel. Define either postirony or paradessence and explain some examples (be sure to provide page numbers).
- The savage girl is a symbol. Not only does she represents something else, i.e., the novel's thematic meaning, but she also psychologically stands for Ursula's unconscious feelings. Given the savage girl, what are some of Ursula's unconscious desires and fears and what is the growing theme of the novel?
Informal Writing
The goal of the informal writing assignments is to get you to think actively
about the readings and write analytically about popular culture (become a
critical consumer rather than a blind indulger.) These short assignments of
1-2 double-spaced, typed pages with 1" margins and 12-point fonts will also
prepare you to write the longer, formal papers. Approximately once per week,
you will be asked to respond to an essay or some element of popular culture.
In class responses will be written in Word and turned in on Blackboard.
Out of class responses will be due by the start of class
on the due date, either
as a typed hard copy or a wordprocessing file such as Word, WordPerfect, Works,
or OpenOffice
in Blackboard > Assignments > Informal
Writing #. To retrieve your graded paper, go to Blackboard > My Grades > Informal
Writing #. Click the green check mark to open up your grade; your graded
paper is the attached file in section 3 Feedback to Student. Click here for
grading rationale and calculation of informal writing assignments.
- Cult-Speak
- Respond to either either Kalle Lasn's "The Cult You're In" or
Richard Fox's "Salespeak." First and foremost, summarize the essay's thesis and argument. Second, argue for
or against the author's analysis. Why do you agree or disagree with the
writer's assessment? Are you in a "cult"? Do you use "salespeak"?
- Due: Wednesday, January
18
- Ads and Women
- Respond to either Jennifer L. Pozner's interview with Jean Kilbourne or Gloria Steinem's article. First, summarize the author's
argument, then discuss how you act if you were in the writer's shoes. What
would you do, for yourself and your daughter, if you believed you lived
in a "toxic cultural environment" as Kilbourne describes American advertising?
What would you do if you were an editor being pressured by advertisers
for good copy as Steinem was?
- Due:
Wednesday, January 25
- Reality TV
- Respond to either Tom Bissell's "Nazis, Nuremberg, and Gold-Digging
Women" or Jan Jagodzinski's "The Perversity of (Real)ity
TV: A Symptom of Our Times" by first and foremost summarizing the
essay's thesis and argument. According to the article, what is the popular
appeal of reality tv? What kind of reality is portrayed on reality tv,
and what does reality tv do for/to its audience and culture?
- Due:
Wednesday, February 1
- As Bees in Honey Drown
- Discuss one of the main characters in As Bees in Honey Drown. Examine
character traits, desires, and fears, and then discuss
issues and themes involving celebrity and pop culture that arise in
the play. Be as specific as possible; responses submitted after class discussion
will be considered late.
- Due: Monday, March 6
- The Savage Girl
- Do a character sketch of one of the main characters from the first third of the novel: Ursula Van Urden, Ivy, or Chas Lacouture. What is that character's attitude toward art, advertising, and/or consumerism? Moving beyond the specific character, what is the novel's evolving theme regarding the culture of consumption?
- Due: Monday, April 10
- Paper 3 Outline
- Compose a one-page outline of your final paper. Your outline can be as informal or formal as you wish and you can follow any style that you learned in high school or English 101. The point is to make sure that you provide your working thesis statement, major sections of the paper, and research sources used. On Wednesday, your peers and I will give you feedback on your working thesis, structure, and analysis.
- Submit your outline, in Word format only, to two places 1) to me at Blackboard > Assignments > Informal Writing 6 and 2) to your peers at Blackboard > Groups > Paper 2 - Group # > File Exchange. Note that peers do not have to respond in writing to the outline.
- Due: Monday, April 17
Peer Response
You will be given the opportunity to revise your first two
formal papers based upon not only my comments but your peer's comments as well.
You will provide constructive criticism to three or four other members of the
class as will they to you. Peer Response is broken down into two phases: written
response and verbal response. The written response is due on the same day the
peer response group meets to discuss their papers.
Paper 1
Groups
- Group 1: Monday, February 13 from 2:00-2:45PM
- David Aylor, Marissa Cundiff, Morgan Harms, Crystal Knuckles, Brent Nichter
- Group 2: Monday, February 13 from 2:15-3:00PM
- David Breehl, Brittany Dalton, Lauren Holtgrave, Allison
Pelette
- Group 3: Monday, February 13 from 2:30-3:15PM
- Elise Burdette, Lori Ferree, Jessica Martin, Dylan Meador, Dan Nitzken
- Group 4: Wednesday, February 15 from 2:00-2:45PM
- Tiara Cannon, Ryan Feyh, Mary Hamm, Claire Mosley, Trevor Persinger
- Group 5: Wednesday, February 15 from 2:15-3:00PM
- Rosa Bani, Ilene Cook, Lindsey Gong, Nate Kadetz, Brandon Rogers
Written Responses
- Length: Write one response (a minimum of one double-spaced page)
for each of your fellow group members' papers
- Format: Word file
- Due: All written peer responses are due on the date and time that
your peer group meets. Turn in your peer responses to two places:
- me via Blackboard > Assignments > Paper 1 Peer Response (save all responses before
clicking the submit button)
- your peers via Blackboard > Groups > Paper 1 - Group # > File Exchange.
Use the following issues to help you to formulate your one page, double-spaced
response to each peer's paper. Even if you find the paper good, you must
still comment on these issues. You can always engage a conversation with the
writer about how you're analyzing the issue differently, for that dialogue
can also help the writer in the revision process.
- Style and Grammar
- Does the paper follow the formal
and stylistic guidelines of the Modern Language Association? Does
it maintain 1-inch margins, a header, double-spacing, etc.? Does it properly
quote and cite sources?
- Mark grammatical, usage, and typographical computer errors. However,
if they are so frequent that you're doing more marking than reading, write
a general note to the author explaining that fact.
- Thesis and Controlling Idea
- Does the paper guide its argument with a strong, clear thesis?
- Does the thesis evoke the complexity and nuance of the issue at hand?
- Does the controlling idea of the paper successfully bridge the original
essay's argument with the writer's own ideas?
- Argument
- What evidence does the paper use to argue its case?
- Does the paper convince you of its argument about an issue of pop culture?
Why or why not?
- Organization
- Does each paragraph or section, advance, support, and/or develop the
controlling thesis?
- Do the paper's paragraphs and sections build upon and/or follow one
another in a logical, effective ways?
- Voice
- Does the paper fairly and accurately represent the original author's
argument?
- Does the paper use a formal, strong, and authoritative voice regarding
its own ideas?
- Successes and Weaknesses
- Where is the paper most successful? least? What does it do right? Where
does it need work?
- Quality and Creativity
- Is the paper of sound quality and caliber?
- Does the paper approach its analysis of pop culture in innovative, original
ways?
Peer Response Discussion
In the peer response meeting, group members will share their responses in verbal
form. Writers take turns listening to their group members review their work.
Specifically, the group should go around the circle and state
- what they think the writer's thesis or controlling idea is
- whether or not the writer fairly and accurately presented the argument of
the essay she summarized
- whether or not the writer presented a valid and adequate reaction, be it
extension or critique, of the original essay
- any other comments for revision
Paper 2
Groups
All peer groups will meet Wednesday, March 22. (There will be no class on Monday, March 20 because I will be out of town.)
- Group 1: David Aylor, Ilene Cook, Morgan Harms, Dylan Meador, Claire Mosley
- Group 2: Elise Burdette, Lori Ferree, Mary Hamm, Nate Kadetz, Brandon Rogers
- Group 3: David Breehl, Ryan Feyh, Lauren Holtgrave, Dan Nitzken, Allison
Pelette
- Group 4: Tiara Cannon, Brittany Dalton, Lindsey Gong, Trevor Persinger
- Group 5: Rosa Bani, Marissa Cundiff, Jessica Martin, Brent Nichter
Written Peer Response
- Length: Write one response (250 words minimum) for each of
your fellow group member's papers.
- Format: Word file
- Due: All written peer responses are due on the date and time that
your peer group meets. Turn in your peer responses to two places:
- me via Blackboard > Assignments > Paper 1 Peer Response
- your peers via Blackboard > Groups > Paper 1 - Group # > File Exchange
Use the following issues to help you to formulate your 250 word response to
each peer's paper. Even if you find the paper good, you should still comment
on these issues. Don't be vague; talk specifically about particular ideas and
analyses. You can always engage a conversation with the writer about how you're
analyzing the issue differently, for that dialogue can also help the writer
in the revision process.
- Grammar
- Mark grammatical, usage, and typographical computer errors. However,
if they are so frequent that you're doing more marking than reading, write
a general note to the author explaining that fact.
- Thesis
- Does the paper have a specific overarching, controlling idea regarding
a television program, musical artist, or television/music issue?
- Does the paper successfully bridge the analysis of a particular television
program, musical artist, or television/music issue with analysis of
genre?
- Organization and Argument
- Does each paragraph or section support and develop the controlling
thesis?
- Does the paper's structure help to convince you of its argument about
the television program, musical artist, or television/music issue?
- Voice
- Does the paper create a distinct voice?
- Does the paper successfully incorporate the voices of the other two
articles into its own voice?
- Successes and Weaknesses
- Where is the paper most successful? least?
- Quality and Creativity
- Does the paper evoke authority?
- Does the paper approach its analysis in innovative, original ways?
Peer Response Discussion
In the peer response meeting, group members will share their responses in
verbal form. Writers take turns listening to their group members review their
work. Specifically, the group should go around the circle and state
- what they think the writer's thesis or controlling idea is
- whether or not the writer provided a convincing analysis of the television
program, musical artist, or television/music issue
- whether or not the writer successfully incorporated the two articles into
her essay
- any other comments for revision
Paper 3 Outline
- Group 1: David Aylor, Ilene Cook, Morgan Harms, Dylan Meador, Claire Mosley
- Group 2: Elise Burdette, Lori Ferree, Mary Hamm, Nate Kadetz, Brandon Rogers
- Group 3: David Breehl, Ryan Feyh, Lauren Holtgrave, Dan Nitzken, Allison
Pelette
- Group 4: Tiara Cannon, Brittany Dalton, Lindsey Gong, Trevor Persinger
- Group 5: Rosa Bani, Marissa Cundiff, Jessica Martin, Brent Nichter
Your final peer response session will be oral only. Come to class on Wednesday,
April 19 prepared to discuss
the strengths and weaknesses of your peers' outline for their third paper.
In the roundtable review, be sure to address the following questions.
- Does the author have a focused, strong, and effective thesis?
- Does the author have sufficient body paragraphs that break down and address
different aspects of the controlling idea?
- Does the proposed organization seem effective?
- Does the author have sufficient research and counterargument?
Paper 1
In the previous three informal writing assignments, you made initial summaries
of authors' arguments about the American consumerist world view and did your
own semiotic analysis of an advertisement selling such a good. The goal of the
first paper is for you to fully enter into the debate on consumerism by rigorously
summarizing one of the essays we've read in class. Choose an author whose argument
you wish to either expand upon or refute. In either case, your
paper should summarize, fairly and accurately, the author's argument. Evaluate that argument: analyze and criticize, affirm and interrogate,
but always be fair to the author's argument. Finally, your paper should provide
your own perspective, your own argument (analysis and ideas) by either agreeing
with the essay but furthering its point with your own ideas, or disagreeing
with the essay and offering counterargument of your own.
You will write two drafts of this paper: first, an ungraded draft that will
be responded to by me and your peers (see peer response
guidelines), and second, a final, graded draft that revises the first draft.
- Length: 3-4 pages
- If your first or second draft does not meet the length requirement,
the second, graded draft will be penalized one letter grade.
- Format: MLA style in a Word file
- Here is an MLA styled template for Microsoft
Word.
- If your second draft does not meet MLA standards of format and quotation
style, it will be penalized one letter grade.
- Due Dates
- Wednesday, February 9
- Draft 1 is due to me via Blackboard > Assignments > Paper
1, Draft 1.
- Draft 1 is due to your peer response group via Blackboard > Groups > Paper
1 - Group # > File Exchange.
- Monday, February 14 or Wednesday, February 16, depending on your peer
response group time
- Peer Responses are
due to me via Blackboard > Assignments > Paper
1 Peer Response.
- Peer responses are due to your peers via Blackboard > Groups > Paper
1 - Group # > File Exchange.
- Wednesday, February 22
- Draft 2 is due to me only via Blackboard> Assignments > Paper
1, Draft 2.
Paper 2
In the first paper, you summarized a writer's argument and then provided your
own evaluation of the subject. In the second paper, you will provide your
own analysis first and foremost, and use two authors' essays to support your
argument. Analyze either a specific television program or musical artist or an
issue in music or television. First and foremost, discuss the program,
artist, or issue's prime theme or meaning. Interpret what statement the program,
artist, or issue says about popular culture and/or culture in general. Determine
the thematic and cultural meaning of the program, artist, or issue. Your essay
must utilize two articles to help it prove its point, either one that we've
read in our textbook and one that you yourself find using the library databases,
or two that you find yourself. ***Note: if you analyzed reality television
in your last paper, you cannot write about it in this paper.
The outside articles, which you can find using the information gained from
our library research demonstration,
should be from a scholarly book chapter, a scholarly journal (published four
times per year and consisting of writers who are academics in the field),
or a reputable magazine (choose a high quality, substantial, argumentative
and feature length article; editorials, reviews, and short essays are not
acceptable). Finally, note that the point of this essay is not to summarize
and evaluate others' essays, as you did in the first paper, but rather to
construct your own analysis of a television show or musical artist and use
others' work to support that analysis. Breakdown the program or person's message
using the critical and semiotic skills we've been exemplifying in class discussion
and course readings.
For example, you could could analyze The Simpsons using
either the Cantor or Frank article and one other article you find through your
own research. Or you could analyze South Park using Frontline's
"The Merchants of Cool" and an article you find on your own. You
could look at the meaning of Britney Spears or Marilyn Manson in pop culture.
You could analyze issues of celebrity in As Bees in Honey Drown or
issues of music community in Napster. You could look at deadhead culture or
marketing of youth culture. These are just a few of the limitless possibilities.
You will write two drafts of this paper: first, an ungraded draft that will
be responded to by me and your peers (note that the peer response issues and
groups are different for this paper: see peer response
guidelines), and second, a final, graded draft that revises the first draft.
- Length: 4-5 typed pages
- If your first or second draft does not meet the length requirement,
the second, graded draft will be penalized one letter grade.
- Format: MLA style in a Word file
- Here is an MLA styled templates for Microsoft
Word.
- If your second draft does not meet MLA style requirements, it will
be penalized one letter grade.
- Due Dates
- Wednesday, March 8
- Draft 1 is due to me via Blackboard > Assignments > Paper
2, Draft 1.
- Draft 1 is due to your peer response group via Blackboard > Groups > Paper
2 - Group # > File Exchange.
- Monday, March 20
- Peer Responses are
due to me via Blackboard > Assignments > Paper
2 Peer Response.
- Peer responses are due to your peers via Blackboard > Groups > Paper
2 - Group # > File Exchange.
- Wednesday, March 29
- Draft 2 is due to me only via Blackboard> Assignments > Paper
2, Draft 2.
Annotated Bibliography
An annotated bibliography is a list of secondary sources that includes summaries
of those materials. Before your final paper is due, you will
compose an annotated bibliography of the research materials that you might
use in Paper 3. Use this research
handout to guide your search.
- Thesis in Progress: In a few sentences, state your tentative thesis
in progress and the question that is guiding your research. You will be
asked to share this with the class.
- Summary of Findings: In 200 words, summarize your findings.
What are scholars and critics saying about your topic?
- 8 Secondary Sources
- type of sources: At least 2 sources must be scholarly
journal articles. At least 2 sources must be scholarly books or book
chapters. You may use magazine articles if and only if they are
on topic and on point. Do not use encyclopedias or websites.
- arrangement and citation format of sources: arrange sources
alphabetically and format them according to MLA
citation style.
- annotations: summarize and evaluate each of the 8 sources
in 50 words by
- defining the source’s thesis or main idea relevant to the topic
you're researching and
- explaining how the source helps your research
paper
- Length: thesis in progress, summary of findings, and 8
annotated sources
- Format: Conform your annotated bibliography to MLA
citation style and submit in a Word or WordPerfect file
- Due: Wednesday, April 12 via Blackboard > Assignments > Annotated
Bibliography.
Paper 3
In the first paper, you summarized and evaluated a single article on pop culture
consumerism, and in the second paper you used two articles to back up your own
analysis of a television show or music artist. In the third paper, you will
analyze and research a focused topic of your choosing in the arena of popular
culture, but not one you previously wrote a formal paper on. You must
rigorously analyze the meaning of the pop culture phenomenon, and you
must use at least four research sources to help support your analysis
of the issue. Our three units on the American dream of consumerism; televison; film, and literature have covered a broad range of issues
in popular culture; and so you have many issues from which to choose within
the course. You may also select a focused popular culture topic from outside
the course such as, but not limited to, sports, videogames, the internet, the news. You should narrow your
broad topic to a manageable and focused issue or phenomenon.
Here are possible general, unfocused topics I brainstormed: the comic book turned film, the daytime soap opera genre, the WB teen soap opera, the continued appeal of classic rock, the appeal of first-person shooter games, the social significance of MySpace or Facebook, the rise of cable punditry, the fall of the network nightly news. What in popular culture interests you, and what would you like to research? I suggest you clear
your topic with me before beginning your annotated bibliography.
- Length: 5-7 typed pages
- Format: MLA style in
a Word, WordPerfect, Works, OpenOffice, or Rich-Text Format file
- Here are MLA styled templates for Microsoft
Word and Corel
WordPerfect.
- If your paper does not meet MLA style requirements, it will be penalized
one letter grade.
- Due Date: Wednesday, April 26 by 2:30PM via Blackboard > Assignments > Paper
3
- If I do not receive or cannot open your paper, I will send an email
to your university address Wednesday night or Thursday morning. If I
still do not receive or cannot open your paper by Friday, April 28, you
will automatically fail the course.
- Grades, Comments, Paper Return
- You can access your final grade in the course via Ulink after
Monday, May 1.
- If you want comments, please ask for them. If you do request
comments, you can access your graded paper in Blackboard > Tools > View
Grades > Paper 3 after Monday, May 1.