Assignments
GC1Y 1000 Critical Thinking: SciFi & Philosophy, Spring 2016
Section 18: MW 2:00-3:15PM, Arts & Sciences 366
Section 19: MW 3:30-4:45PM, Arts & Sciences 345
In Class Activities
1. Philosophical Questions and Passages
In order to get to know some of your peers and help everyone become accustomed to discussing philosophical issues, today we're going to
- divide into groups of 4-5,
- articulate or extrapolate the key philosophical question posed by the article,
- explain the article's main philosophical concept, and
- explicate two significant passages from the article.
Here are the article groups:
- John Pollock, "Brain in a Vat"
- Nick Bostrom, "Are You in a Computer Simulation?"
- Plato, excerpt from The Republic
- René Descartes, excerpt from The Meditations on First Philosophy
- David J. Chalmers, "The Matrix as Metaphysics"
2. Literary Analysis
For the first two weeks of class, we have discussed philosophy, namely, the nature of reality inspired by the question what do we know and how do we know it. For the next two weeks, we are going to discuss how science fiction short stories and film engage the issue of reality. Refer to our handout on Literary Analysis for a more complete methodology on how to interpret fiction and film. Today, we'll begin our discussion of Heinlein and Borges stories by focusing on how setting, character, and conflict raise questions about reality. Break into six groups, respond to your group's assigned disccusion question, and then share your group's ideas with the class.
- Heinlein, "They," setting: Where and when does the story take place? How does the social environment affect the main character's pysche and structure her conflicts and the overall conflicts of the story? What philosophical idea or theme does the setting suggest about the nature of reality?
- Heinlein, "They," character: What do we learn about the main character from his inner thoughts, what she says, what she does, and what others say about him? What is his core conflict? What is the arc or throughline of his development through the story? Does she resolve or transcend the core conflict by the story's end? What philosophical idea or theme does the character suggest about the nature of reality?
- Heinlein, "They," conflict: What is the primary cause and motivation of the story? What tension must be traversed? How is the main character's inner conflict resolved, or not? How is the external plot conflict resolved, or not? What philosophical idea or theme does the story's core conflict suggest about the nature of reality?
- Borges, "The Library of Babel," setting: Where and when does the story take place? How does the library affect the people in general as well as the main character in particular? In other words, how do characters in the story respond to the library? What philosophical idea or theme does the setting suggest about the nature of reality?
- Borges, "The Library of Babel," character: Who is in the story, and what do we learn about them? What conflicts or issues do the characters have? Do the characters resolve or transcend the core conflict by the story's end? What philosophical idea or theme do the characters suggest about the nature of reality?
- Borges, "The Library of Babel," conflict: What is the primary cause and motivation of the story? What tension must be traversed? Is the main character's inner conflicts resolved, or not? Is the external plot conflict resolved, or not? What philosophical idea or theme does the story's core conflict suggest about the nature of reality?
3. Brainstorming the Philosophical Essay
Spend five minutes on your own brainstorming a possible topic for the upcoming philosophical paper by answering the following questions.
- Select a short story or film from the syllabus up to February 17
- Heinlein, "They"
- Borges, "The Libary of Babel"
- Bradbury, "The World the Children Made"
- Lem, "Solaris"
- Inception
- Oblivion
- Leiber, "Catch That Zeppelin!"
- Dick, "Impostor"
- Dick, "The Minority Report"
- Dick, "We Can Remember It for You Wholesale"
- Dark City
- The Thirteenth Floor
- What philosophical question(s) does the short story or film pose?
- What philosophical conflicts or debates does the short story or film illustrate?
- To what philosophical conclusions does the short story or film come?
- Which two philosophical essays from the syllabus up to February 17 include concepts that are aptly applied in the short story or film?
- Pollock, "Brain in a Vat"
- Bostrom, "Are You in a Computer Simulation?"
- Plato, excerpt from The Republic
- Descartes, excerpt from The Meditations on First Philosophy
- Chalmers, "The Matrix as Metaphysics"
- Dennett, "Where Am I?"
- Olson, "Personal Identity"
- Parfit, "Divided Minds and the Nature of Persons"
- Kurzweil, "Who Am I? What Am I?"
- Huemer, "Free Will and Determinism in Minority Report"
- Goldman, excerpt from "The Book of Life"
Next, find a partner and spend ten minutes sharing and evaluating each others' answers to the above questions.
4. Developing a Thesis and Outline for the Philosophical Essay
Using your ideas from the In Class Activity: Brainstorming the Philosophical Essay (or determining the philosophical questions, conflicts, and conclusions from a different short story or film on the syllabus) and applying the Developing Your Thesis page, compose a potential thesis for your Philosophical Essay, one that makes a claim about the philosophical meaning of the literary work, defines the scope of your argument about the literary meaning and philosophical concepts, and shapes your argument. Then, develop an outline that breaks down and proves component claims of the thesis.
5. Practicing MLA Style
According to the Online Writing Lab at Purdue, formal essays require a standard style in order to
- Provide your readers with cues they can use to follow your ideas more efficiently and to locate information of interest to them
- Allow readers to focus more on your ideas by not distracting them with unfamiliar or complicated formatting
- Establish your credibility or ethos in the field by demonstrating an awareness of your audience and their needs as fellow researchers (particularly concerning the citing of references) ("MLA Overview and Workshop")
Your reader cannot focus on your essay's ideas when she is distracted by unconventional or careless formatting. Moreover, your essay will lose credibility because it does not indicate awareness or concern for standards. Unless or until you are comfortable writing in MLA format, I strongly recommend that you not only refer to an MLA style guide, such as this one, when composing format essays in this class but also perform this checklist before submitting a paper. Today, you're going to practice MLA style in advance of the first formal essay. Take out a sheet of paper (or use a word processing program on your device) to complete the following questions.
- Running Header: What does the running header consist of and where is it located?
- Font: What font and font size should the essay use, including in the running header and Works Cited page?
- Margins: What margins should the essay use?
- Heading: What four items make up the essay's heading?
- Title: Where is the essay title located? Should it be boldfaced, italicized, underlined, or put in quotes?
- Spacing: What is the line spacing of the entire essay, including between paragraphs and in block quotes?
- Titles of Works: Should the titles of books and films be put in italics or quotation marks? Should the title of essays and short stories be put in italics or quotation marks?
- Quotation, Part I—Introduction: Select and introduce a passage from Ray Kurzweil's "Who Am I? What Am?"
- Quotation, Part II—Style: Does the selected passage require in-text quotation format or block quotation format? Style the passage accordingly.
- Parenthetical Citation: Provide a parenthetical citation for the quoted passage.
- Quotation Explanation: Explain or interpret the passage.
- Works Cited: Compose a Works Cited entry for Ray Kurzweil's "Who Am I? What Am I?"
6. Composing an Annotation for an Annotated Bibliography
After discussing Dark City as a class, let's break into groups of 3-4 in order to practice writing an annotation for the annotated bibliography coming up in the Group Project. Each 75-100 word annotation should summarize and evaluate Jonathan Romney's scholarly journal article "Games Pixels Play" by
- identifying the question, issue, or topic that the source is investigating,
- defining the source's thesis or conclusion regarding Dark City, and
- explaining how the essay helps your literary and philosophical understanding of Dark City.
7. Questioning Humanity
Today, let's divide spend 15 minutes discussing the following questions about robots and humanity in your group's short story assigned from the three stories we read today. Students who are scheduled to respond to the stories will report their response and their group's discussions.
Here are the stories and respondents:
- Isaac Asimov, "The Bicentennial Man"
- James Causey, "The Show Must Go On"
- Brian W. Aldiss, "Who Can Replace a Man?"
Here are the questions:
- How are robots characterized in the story, i.e., what is their core trait?
- How are humans characterized in the story, i.e., what is their core trait?
- What is the core conflict in the story and how is it resolved?
- What does the story say about humanity?
8. Composing an Annotation, Redux
After discussing Blade Runner as a class, break into your Group Project teams in order to practice writing an annotation for the annotated bibliography coming up in the Group Project. Each 75-100 word annotation should summarize and evaluate Deborah Knight and George McKnight's scholarly journal article "What Is It to Be Human? Blade Runner and Dark City" by
- identifying the question, issue, or topic that the source is investigating,
- defining the source's thesis or conclusion regarding Blade Runner, and
- explaining how the essay helps your literary and philosophical understanding of Blade Runner.
Submit the collectively written annotation to GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Group Project.
9. Making a Plan of Action
A month-long group research project requires making a plan of action that answers the following questions:
- Has each group member provided a way to be contacted by the group?
- When will your group finalize the working bibliography and who will be responsible for it?
- When will your group meet to discuss the primary text?
- When will your group meet to create the presentation?
- How will your group divide up writing the annotations for the annotated bibliography?
- Will your presentation have an audiovisual component like a PowerPoint or Prezi?
- If so, who will be responsible for creating the presentation?
- When will your group meet to practice the presentation?
Submit your group's plan of action to GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Group Project.
Response
Written Response
The written response compels you to practice responding to philosophical or literary ideas
If you are scheduled to respond to a philosophical text, summarize and evaluate—appreciate and interrogate—one of the philosophical readings for the scheduled day. What is the main idea of the text and how does it function in human life? What questions do you have of the main idea and how do you assess the value and validity of the idea?
If you are scheduled to respond to a science fiction short story or film, analyze the characters and conflicts and posit what main thematic and philosophical ideas the story or film suggests. Avoid plot summary. What are the core issues of the work, and with what philosophical concepts does the work tarry? How do you respond or answer back to the ideas posed by the story?
Informal Presentation
The informal presentation compels you to participate in and direct class discussion.
Without simply reading your written response, you will also be responsible for a brief, informal presentation, which should either introduce the philosophical essay by defining key points and terms and main ideas and broaching issues for class discussion or introduce the short story/film by explaining key characters and conflicts and themes and broaching questions for class discussion.
Parameters
- Length: 2-3 pages for the paper, 3-5 minutes for the informal presentation
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due Dates:
- Your written response will be due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Response on the day before we are scheduled to discuss a text
- Your informal presentation will be due on the day we are schedule to discuss the text in class.
- If you fail to submit the response to GeorgiaVIEW the day the informal presentation, you will not be allowed to present and you will fail the assignment. It is your responsibility to check the sign up schedule and complete the assignment on time.
- Grades: You will be graded on your ability to analyze the main ideas of the texts as well as informally present those ideas to the class. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Response approximately one week after you present to the class. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless and until you upload it to the Dropbox. Here's how to calculate your course grade.
Sign Up
Refer to the syllabus course schedule for text information like title and location.
Philosophical Essay
We have discussed the nature of reality and the self with the help of philosophers such a Pollock, Bostrom, Plato, Descartes, Chalmers, Dennett, Olson, Parfit, Kurzweil, Huemer, and Goldman. As a class, we have applied their philosophical concepts to short stories by Heinlein, Borges, Bradbury, Lem, Leiber, and Dick as well as the films Inception and Dark City. Many of you have written philosophical or literary responses to these texts. For the first formal paper, you will interpret a short story or film through the lens of a philosophical concept in a 4-5 page essay. Choose a short story or film on the syllabus up to Wednesday, February 17 (besides the short stories and films mentioned above, you may also write about the recommended films Oblivion and The Thirteenth Floor). Write a well-focused, well-organized, thesis-driven essay, formatted in MLA style, that combines philosophical and literary analysis of the short story or film, making sure to incorporate pertinent ideas from at least two of the philosophical texts we have read so far. Beside quoting and analyzing significant passages from both philosophical and literary texts, your essay should answer the following questions: What philosophical question(s) does the text pose? What philosophical concept(s) does the text convey? What conflict(s) and theme(s) does the text suggest, and how do the conflict(s) and theme(s) apply the philosophical questions and ideas?
Parameters
- Length: 4-5 pages
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due: GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Philosophical Essay on Monday, February 22
- Grades: Your essay will be graded on thesis, organization, understanding of the philosophical concepts and questions, and literary analysis. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Philosophical Essay approximately one to two weeks after submission. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless and until you upload it to the Dropbox. Here's how to calculate your course grade.
Reflective Essay
At this point in the course, you have responded to a philosophical or literary reading and written a full-length essay proving how a short story or film applies philosophical concepts. For the learning beyond the classroom component of the course, you will participate in a science fiction and fantasy social activity—such as a role playing board game like Dungeons & Dragons, massively multi-player online role playing game (MMORPG) like World of Warcraft, a Renaissance fair, a convention like Dragon Con in Atlanta, a cosplay event, or fan fiction community—and then write an essay critically analyzing the experience. For instance, you could attend Dragon Con and compose a reflective essay thinking about how the experience affected your sense of self and/or reality, in the philosophical ways we've been discussing, like Pierson-Smith's and Lamerichs', to support your ideas. Your topic must be approved one month before the essay is due; therefore, submit three possible science fiction and fantasy participatory experiences on Monday, March 7. Your essay has three goals: first, describe and analyze the social experience you attended and/or participated in; second, reflect upon the experience by making a claim about the key philosophical ideas that are in play, and, third, incorporate ideas from two applicable philosophical essays from our course.
Parameters
- Length: 4-5 pages
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due Dates
- List of Three Possible Topics: GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Reflective Essay on Monday, March 9
- Reflective Essay: GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Reflective Essay on Wednesday, April 6
- Grades: Your essay will be graded on your analysis of the experience, your reflections on the philosophical concepts, and your integration of two supporting philosophical articles. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Reflective Essay approximately two weeks after submission. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless and until you upload it to the Dropbox. Here's how to calculate your course grade.
Group Project
As a class we have discussed various philosophical issues in multiple short stories and film. Individually, you have written about the philosophical concepts explored in a single literary or filmic text in the philosophical essay, and you have reflected upon your participation in a science fiction activity. Next, in groups, you will 1) research and analyze a prominent science fiction text, starting with a book in the Popular Culture and Philosophy series as your first source, 2) explain the science fiction subgenre's or related genre's context and tradition, and 3) articulate the predominant philosophical questions of the text and genre while comparing and contrasting the philosophical concerns to a few in-class readings.
Your group will 1) compose an annotated bibliography that summarizes 20 high quality research sources (5 sources per group members, 4 members per group; 10 sources may be from the Blackwell or Open Court collection while the rest should be a range of journal articles and books), and 2) deliver a presentation to the class that interprets the text, explains the literary tradition from which the genre derives, and articulates the text and genre's core philosophical issues. Each 75-100 word annotation should summarize and evaluate a research source by
- identifying the question, issue, or topic that the source is investigating,
- defining the source's thesis or conclusion regarding the author, genre, or text being researched, and
- explaining how the essay helps your literary and/or philosophical understanding of the author, genre, or text.
Parameters
- Annotated Bibliography: Use the Research Methods webpage to find 20 high quality secondary sources on your topic (science fiction text and science fiction subgenre or related genre) per group member. 10 of the sources must be essays from the group topic book in the Blackwell or Open Court Press Pop Culture and Philosophy Open series. At least 4 secondary sources must be scholarly books or book chapters and at least 4 must be scholarly journal articles; the final 2 sources may be comprised of lengthy magazine articles and web sources that make substantial claims (however, scholarly journal articles and scholarly books are preferred when available). Neither reference sites like Wikipedia and Sparknotes nor student created websites are appropriate sources. When in doubt, ask your instructor if the source is apt. Each properly cited and styled MLA style source must be accompanied by a 75-100 word annotation.
- Presentation: 15 minute presentation in which all group members participate and teach the class about the science fiction text, science fiction subgenre or related genre from which the text comes, and the philosophical issues of text and genre (compare and contrast these concerns to a few of our in-class texts).
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due Date: GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work> Dropbox > Group Project on the scheduled presentation date.
- Group Policy: Each group member is responsible for staying connected with the group, attending meetings, actively participating in meetings, and doing her delegated work, in other words, contributing her fair share to the project. In order to hold singular members accountable in a team project, each group member must individually compose and submit to GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Group Project - Individual Evaluation a paragraph that assesses their own performance (what meetings you did and did not attend, what work you did and did not do) and their peers' service to the assignment. If it becomes apparent that a group member did not participate (skipped meetings, didn't complete her assigned work, and so forth), that member will be assessed individually rather than receive the group grade. Grades will not be returned until all members complete the individual evaluation.
- Grades: Your project will be graded on the quality of research, annotations, textual interpretation, and philosophical understanding. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Group Project approximately one week after the presentation. If there is a need for individual grades instead of a group grade, collect your individual grade in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Group Project - Individual Evaluation.
Timeline
Date |
Due |
---|---|
W, 2-24 |
|
W, 3-2 | |
W, 3-9 | |
W, 3-16 | |
M, 4-4 | |
W, 4-20 | Group Presentations 1 and 2 |
M, 4-25 | Group Presentations 3 and 4 |
W, 4-27 | Group Presentations 5 and 6 |
Sign Up
Group |
2:00 Topics/Students |
3:30 Topics/Students |
---|---|---|
1 |
date: Monday, 4-25 text: Frankenstein genre: gothic novel, horror |
date: Monday, 4-25 text: Doctor Who genre: time travel |
1 Chyles Dean |
Lillith Brisbon |
|
2 Will Harper |
Isabel Godfrey |
|
3 Jonathan Novajosky |
Joey Thornton |
|
4 Duncan Williams |
Patrick Triana |
|
2 |
date: Monday, 4-25 text: The Hunger Games genre: dystopian |
date: Monday, 4-25 text: The Walking Dead genre: zombie, horror, post-apocalypse |
5 Summer Center |
Terez Chapman |
|
6 Madeline Houston |
Khadeem Coumarbatch |
|
7 Carmen Joiner |
Zaria Gholston |
|
8 Margaret Rapkin |
Holly Rohan / Xavier Schroeder |
|
3 |
date: Wednesday, 4-27 text: The Hobbit genre: fantasy |
date: Wednesday, 4-27 text: Harry Potter subgenre: fantasy |
9 |
Rachael Alesia |
|
10 Haley Garrett |
Ashlyn Nesbitt |
|
11 Angelina Reynolds |
Luke Smith |
|
12 |
Mariah Wall |
|
4 |
date: Wednesday, 4-27 genre: space opera |
date: Wednesday, 4-27 genre: high fantasy |
13 Adam Guzman |
Courtney Banks |
|
14 Wellsley Kesel |
Lauren Barnard |
|
15 Chris Peterson |
Meghan Hilton |
|
16 Julie Wiman |
Sami Montigny |
|
5 |
date: Monday, 5-2 genre: superhero/comic book |
date: Monday, 5-2 text: Alice in Wonderland genre: fantasy |
17 Brad Benton |
Taylor Depol |
|
18 Matt Makurat |
Ben Stokes |
|
19 Emma Smith |
Caelan Tackitt |
|
20 John Weinmann and Cameron Yeo |
Haley Willis |
|
6 |
date: Monday, 5-2 text: Twilight genre: romance fantasy/supernatural |
date: Monday, 5-2 text: X-Men genre: superhero |
21 Mallory Finley |
Stephen Kyle Castleberry |
|
22 Charles Lee |
Nick Hess |
|
23 Janie Martin |
Matt McCorkle |
|
24 Amy Stinnett |
John Mitchell |
Topics
Pick three possible science fiction topics for professor approval, based on the list of books below by Wednesday, March 2 in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Group Project. Receive feedback on your topics in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Group Project by Friday, March 4.
Book |
Subgenre or Related Genre |
Publisher |
---|---|---|
Alice in Wonderland |
fantasy |
Blackwell |
Avatar and Philosophy: Learning to See |
climate fiction |
Blackwell |
The Avengers and Philosophy: Earth's Mightiest Thinkers |
superhero |
Blackwell |
Batman and Philosophy: The Dark Knight of the Soul |
superhero |
Blackwell |
Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy: Knowledge Here Begins Out There and/or Battlestar Galactica and Philosophy: Mission Accomplished or Mission Frakked Up? |
military science fiction, post-apocalyptic fiction, space opera |
Blackwell or Open |
BioShock and Philosophy: Irrational Game, Rational Book |
biopunk, first-person shooter video game |
Blackwell |
Buffy the Vampire Slayer: Fear and Trembling in Sunnydale |
supernatural, fantasy, horror |
Open |
The Chronicles of Narnia and Philosophy: The Lion, the Witch, and the Worldview |
high fantasy |
Open |
Divergent and Philosophy |
dystopia |
Open |
Doctor Who and Philosophy: Bigger on the Inside and/or More Doctor Who and Philosophy |
time travel |
Open |
Dune and Philosophy |
soft science fiction |
Open |
Dungeons and Dragons and Philosophy: Read and Gain Advantage on All Wisdom Checks and/or Dungeons and Dragons and Philosophy |
fantasy, tabletop role-playing game |
Blackwell or Open |
Ender's Game and Philosophy: The Logic Gate Is Down and/or Ender's Game and Philosophy |
military science fiction |
Blackwell or Open |
Final Fantasy and Philosophy: The Ultimate Walkthrough |
fantasy, role-playing video game |
Blackwell |
Frankenstein and Philosophy |
gothic novel, horror |
Open |
Futurama and Philosophy |
science fiction sitcom |
Open |
Neil Gaiman and Philosophy |
fantasy, horror, science fiction, dark fantasy |
Open |
Game of Thrones and Philosophy: Logic Cuts Deeper Than Swords |
fantasy, high fantasy |
Blackwell |
The Golden Compass and Philosophy: God Bits the Dust |
fantasy, steampunk |
Open |
Green Lantern and Philosophy: No Evil Shall Escape This Book |
superhero |
Blackwell |
Halo and Philosophy |
military science fiction, first-person shooter video game |
Open |
The Ultimate Harry Potter and Philosophy: Hogwarts for Muggles and/or Harry Potter and Philosophy: If Aristotle Ran Hogwarts |
fantasy |
Blackwell or Open |
Heroes and Philosophy: Buy the Book, Save the World |
superhero |
Blackwell |
The Hobbit and Philosophy: For When You've Lost Your Dwarves, Your Wizard, and Your Way |
high fantasy |
Blackwell |
The Hunger Games and Philosophy: A Critique of Pure Treason |
dystopian |
Blackwell |
Iron Man and Philosophy: Facing the Stark Reality |
superhero |
Blackwell |
Jurassic Park and Philosophy: The Truth Is Terrifying |
action and thriller |
Open |
The Legend of Zelda: I Link Therefore I Am |
high fantasy, action video game |
Open |
The Lord of the Rings: One Book to Rule Them All |
high fantasy |
Open |
Ultimate Lost and Philosophy: Think Together, Die Alone |
time travel, supernatural |
Blackwell |
The Matrix and Philosophy: Welcome to the Desert of the Real and/or More Matrix and Philosophy |
cyberpunk |
Open |
Planet of the Apes and Philosophy |
post-apocalyptic science fiction |
Open |
Spider-Man and Philosophy: The Web of Inquiry |
superhero |
Blackwell |
Star Trek and Philosophy: The Wrath of Kant |
science fiction, space western |
Open |
The Ultimate Star Wars and Philosophy: You Must Unlearn What You Have Learned and/or Star Wars and Philosophy: More Powerful Than You Can Possibly Imagine |
space opera |
Blackwell or Open |
Superman and Philosophy: What Would the Man of Steel Do? Supernatural and Philosophy: Metaphysics and Monsters....for Idjits |
superhero |
Blackwell |
Terminator and Philosophy: I'll Be Back, Therefore I Am |
time travel |
Blackwell |
The Transformers and Philosophy: More Than Meets the Mind |
science fiction action |
Open |
True Blood and Philosophy: We Wanna Think Bad Things with You |
horror, dark fantasy, supernatural |
Blackwell |
Twilight and Philosophy: Vampires, Vegetarians, and the Pursuit of Immortality |
romance fantasy |
Blackwell |
The Walking Dead and Philosophy: Shotgun. Machete. Reason. and/or The Walking Dead and Philosophy and/or The Ultimate Walking Dead and Philosophy |
horror |
Blackwell or Open |
Watchmen and Philosophy: A Rorschach Test |
alternate history, social science fiction |
Blackwell |
The Wizard of Oz and Philosophy: Wicked Wisdom of the West |
fantasy |
Open |
World of Warcraft and Philosophy: Wrath of the Philosopher King |
fantasy, massively multiplayer online role-playing game |
Open |
X-Men and Philosophy: Astonishing Insight and Uncanny Argument in the Mutant X-Verse |
superhero |
Blackwell |
While the following books cannot be used for topics, they may serve as additional resources for some group projects:
- Superheroes and Philosophy: Truth, Justice, and the Socratic Way (Open Court)
- Supervillains and Philosophy: Sometimes, Evil Is Its Own Reward (Open Court)
- The Undead and Philosophy: Chicken Soup for the Soulless (Open Court)
- Zombies, Vampires, and Philosophy (Open Court)
Preliminary Bibliographies
After receiving feedback on your three topics by Friday, March 4, use the Research Methods webpage to compile three tentative bibliographies, one for each of your three possible science fiction text and subgenre or related genre topic combinations. Each tentative bibliography should include 5 scholarly journal articles and 5 books/book chapters and have secondary sources that interpret the science fiction text and categorize the science fiction subgenre or related genre. The three bibliographies, styled in MLA format, are due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Group Project on Wednesday, March 9. Your group's final topic will be approved on the basis of researchability by Friday, March 11. Once your final topic is approved, your group should immediately gather the research materials by checking books out of the library or ordering them through interlibrary loan, as well as making copies of articles or ordering them through interlibrary.
Plan of Action
On Wednesday, March 16, submit a plan of action to GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Group Project that details answers to the following questions:
- Has each group member provided a way to be contacted by the group?
- When will your group finalize the working bibliography and who will be responsible for it?
- When will your group meet to discuss the primary text?
- When will your group meet to create the presentation?
- How will your group divide up writing the annotations for the annotated bibliography?
- Will your presentation have an audiovisual component like a PowerPoint or Prezi?
- If so, who will be responsible for creating the presentation?
- When will your group meet to practice the presentation?
Working Bibliography and Research Statement
On Monday, April 4, submit a working bibliography and research statement in one document to GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Group Project.
The working bibliography should be a 20 source MLA formatted and alphabetized list (no annotations, simply a list) comprised of
- 10 essays from the group topic book in the Blackwell or Open Court Press Pop Culture and Philosophy series.
- 4-5 scholarly journal articles (though 5 are preferable) on the group topic and subgenre
- 4-5 books or books chapters (though 5 are preferable) on the group topic and subgenre
- 2 optional lengthy magazine articles and/or web sources on the group topic and subgenre
The research statement details your group's research process by listing the library and web sources used in conducting your research.
- What were your search terms?
- Did you check GIL for an exact search by title, an exact search by subject heading, a quick search?
- Did you check GIL Express for an exact search by title, an exact search by subject heading, a quick search?
- Did you use ILLiad?
- Did you check GALILEO library databases like Academic Search Complete, Research Library (ProQuest), JSTOR, Project Muse, Literary Criticism, Literary Reference Center, and MLA International Bibliography?
- Did you use non-library databases like the Directory of Open Access Journals and Google Scholar?
Exam
You have responded both informally and formally to literature and philosophy, you have researched the philosophy informing science fiction and related genres, and you have reflected upon a participatory science fiction or fantasy experience. For the final assignment, you will be examined on the literature and philosophy we have collectively studied on the syllabus after the formal philosophical essay (Wednesday, February 24 through Monday, April; the exam does not include group projects and reflective experiences).
SciFi
- Asimov, "Robot Dreams"
- Asimov, "The Bicentennial Man"
- Causey, "The Show Must Go On"
- Aldiss, "Who Can Replace a Man?"
- Blade Runner
- Ex Machina
- Sutton, "Soul Mate"
- Boucher, "Balaam"
- Sheckley, "Seventh Victim"
- Bradbury, "A Sound of Thunder"
- Heinlein, "All You Zombies—"
- Spinrad, "The Weed of Time"
- Twelve Monkeys
- Primer
Philosophy
- Clark, "A Brain Speaks"
- Block, "The Mind as the Software of the Brain"
- Clark, "Cyborgs Unplugged"
- Dennett, "Consciousness in Human and Robot Minds"
- Kurzweil, "Superintelligence and Singularity"
- Annas, "The Man on the Moon"
- Schneider, "Mindscan: Transcending and Enhancing the Human Brain"
- Leslie, "The Doomsday Argument"
- Anderson, "Asimov's 'Three Laws of Robotics' and Machine Metaethics"
- Bostrom, "Ethical Issues in Advanced Artificial Intelligence"
- Belk, "Extended Self in a Digital World"
- Roesler, "The Self in Cyberspace: Identity Formation..."
- Golumbia, "Games without Play"
- Golub, "Being in the World (of Warcraft): Raiding, Realism, and Knowledge..."
- Derecho, "Archontic Literature: A Definition, a History, and...Fan Fiction"
- Duchesne, "Stardom/Fandom"
- Peirson-Smith, "...An Examination of the Cosplay..."
- Lamerichs, "Stranger Than Fiction: Fan Identity in Cosplay"
- Sider, "Time"
- Lewis, "The Paradoxes of Time Travel"
- Deutsch and Haywood, "The Quantum Physics of Time Travel"
- Hanley, "Miracles and Wonders: Science Fiction and Time Travel"
In class on Monday, April 25, we will generate topics from which the questions will be generated. The topics will be posted here on Wednesday, April 27.
2:00 Topics
- the philosophy of time travel
- human ethics toward robots
- philosophical issues of humanity and technology (for example, dependence on technology, transhumanism, etc.)
- the philosophy of self in the digital world (for example, social media)
- fan culture
- philosophy of games
3:30 Topics
- time travel paradoxes
- ethics involving robots and artificial intelligence
- human selves and technology
- interactive selves (such as video games and cosplay)
- science fiction dystopias
- virtual realities
In order to prepare for the in class, closed book essay exam, I strongly recommend that you create a study guide based upon your annotations of the reading, the discussion board responses, and your class notes. For each short story or film, note the key characters and their traits, core conflicts, philosophical themes, and pertinent quotations. For each philosophical essay, note the key questions and issues, philosophical concepts and conclusions, and pertinent quotations. This guide will look very similar to an annotated bibliography. After creating the study guide, I suggest applying various readings into the comparative topics, noting that not every reading will be appropriate for every topic, and constructing potential comparative thesis statements. Although you will not know the exact questions, you can practice putting different readings into comparison and contrast, and this will help you prepare for the actual essay exam.
In the 135 minutes of exam time, you will write three thesis-driven essays, from a choice of five or six questions, spending about 45 minutes writing each essay, and comparing and contrasting philosophical concepts and literary work. Bring your own blue book or notebook paper.
Parameters
- Length: 3 essays with comparative thesis statements and sufficient textual support to prove your analysis
- Time: 135 minutes total, 45 minutes per essay
- Due Date:
- 2:00 Section: Wednesday, May 4, 3:30-5:45PM
- 3:30 Section: Tuesday, May 3, 3:30-5:45PM
- Grades: Your exam will be graded on the quality of your comparative theses, as well as your knowledge and analysis of the topic and essays. Final grades will be available in PAWS after May 11. In order to read and assess all the exams and papers in my four classes by the final grade deadline, I will not be giving feedback on final project this semester. If you want to know your exam grade, request it in the dialogue box in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Dropbox > Exam Grade by Friday, May 6 and it will be returned there by Wednesay, May 11. I am happy to provide exam feedback at the beginning of fall semester if you email me to set up a conference. Here's how to calculate your course grade.