Assignments
GC1Y 1000 Critical Thinking: SciFi & Philosophy, Spring 2021
Section 02: TR 2:00-3:15 p.m., Online
Section 03: TR 3:30-4:45 p.m., Online
Attendance Make Up Posts
You are required to attend all classes on Zoom. However, you can make up one missed Zoom class per week by submitting a 100-200 word post to the GeorgiaVIEW discussion forum entitled Response Papers and Discussion Questions by the Sunday after you missed class. Reply to questions tied to material from the missed class period. Posts made after this day will not be counted toward your weekly attendance record. If you attend all Zoom classes in the week, you do not need to post to the discussion board.
- Week 2
- Tuesday, January 26: Select one of today's articles and then explain its philosophical question, key philosophical concept, and one significant passage. 2:00 section students may also respond to Griffin Peavy's discussion questions.
- Thursday, January 28: Complete Small Group Activity: Literary Analysis on your own by selecting and responding to one of the six breakout group discussions.
- Week 3
- Tuesday, February 2: Respond to any of the student response discussion questions regarding Bradbury or Gibson short stories.
- Thursday, February 4: Respond to any of the student response discussion questions regarding the film Inception.
- Week 4
- Tuesday, February 9: Respond to any of the student response discussion questions regarding the Dennett, Olson, or Parfitt readings.
- Thursday, February 11: Respond to any of the student response discussion questions regarding the Kurzweil or Huemer readings.
- Week 5
- Tuesday, February 16: Choose either Leiber's "Catch That Zeppelin" or Dick's "Impostor." First, give a brief character sketh of the main character and then discuss the main character's conflict regarding the nature of self.
- Thursday, February 18: After reading Philip K. Dick's "We Can Remember It for You Wholesale," do you think Douglas Quail actually went to Mars? Why or why not? What does the story suggest about the relationship between memory and self?
- Week 6
- Tuesday, February 23: Respond to any of the student response discussion questions regarding Dark City.
- Thursday, February 25: No class, no attendance make up post.
- Week 7
- Tuesday, March 2: Select either Asimov's "Robot Dreams" or Clark's "A Brain Speaks" and discuss either the conflict between human and robot consciousness (Asimov) or the relationship between the human brain and consciousness (Clark).
- Thursday, March 4: On your own, complete the Small Group Activity: Composing an Annotation by selecting one of the four essays and summarizing it.
- Week 8
- Tuesday, March 9: No class.
- Thursday, March 11: Respond to one or two of the student response discussion questions regarding Isaac Asimov's "The Bicentennial Man."
- Week 9
- Tuesday, March 16: Respond to any of the student response discussion questions regarding Blade Runner.
- Thursday, March 18: What are the ethical issues of posthumanism in the George Annas article or transhumanism in the Susan Schneider article?
- Week 10
- Tuesday, March 23: Respond to one of the questions from the Small Group Activity: AI Ethics.
- Thursday, March 25: Respond to any of the student response discussion questions regarding Le Guin's or Jemisin's short stories.
- Week 11
- Tuesday, March 30: Do you think Dr. Moreau's experiments on and subsequent treatment of the Beast Folk are ethical? Why or why not?
- Thursday, April 1: Do you think that Edward Prendick's killing of the Leopard-Man and, later, the Hyena-Swine are ethical? Why or why not?
- Week 12
- Tuesday, April 6: Respond to any of the student response discussion questions regarding Metropolis.
- Thursday, April 8: Respond to any of the student response discussion questions regarding Jiang's article.
- Week 13
- Tuesday, April 13: Select an important passage from either the Lamerichs or Derecho article and explain it.
- Thursday, April 15: No class, no attendance make up.
- Week 14
- Tuesday, April 20: Listen to a podcast and add your thoughts to one of the topics discussed.
- Thursday, April 22: Resond to one set of the group discussions questions from the Small Group Activity: The Philosophy of Time Travel.
- Week 15
- Tuesday, April 27: Answer one of the following questions. In Heinlein's "All You Zombies," do you think the narrator will ever die, why or why not? In Spinrad's "The Weed of Time," how does the narrator conceive of time?
- Thursday, April 29: Respond to any of the student response discussion questions regarding Twelve Monkeys.
Small Group Activities
1. Philosophical Questions and Passages
In order to get to know some of your peers and help everyone become accustomed to discussing philosophical issues, today we're going to
- divide into five groups
- articulate or extrapolate the key philosophical question posed by the article,
- explain the article's main philosophical concept, and
- explicate two significant passages from the article.
Here are the article groups:
- Eric Schwitzgebel and R. Scott Bakker, "Reinstalling Eden: Happiness on a Hard Drive"
- Nick Bostrom, "Are You in a Computer Simulation?"
- Plato, excerpt from The Republic
- René Descartes, excerpt from The Meditations on First Philosophy
- David J. Chalmers, "The Matrix as Metaphysics"
2. Literary Analysis
For the first two weeks of class, we have discussed philosophy, namely, the nature of reality inspired by the question what do we know and how do we know it. For the next two weeks, we are going to discuss how science fiction short stories and film engage the issue of reality. Refer to our handout on Literary Analysis for a more complete methodology on how to interpret fiction and film. Today, we'll begin our discussion of Heinlein and Borges stories by focusing on how setting, character, and conflict raise questions about reality. Break into six groups, respond to your group's assigned disccusion question, and then share your group's ideas with the class.
- Heinlein, "They," setting: Where and when does the story take place? How does the social environment affect the main character's pysche and structure her conflicts and the overall conflicts of the story? What philosophical idea or theme does the setting suggest about the nature of reality?
- Heinlein, "They," character: What do we learn about the main character from his inner thoughts, what she says, what she does, and what others say about him? What is his core conflict? What is the arc or throughline of his development through the story? Does she resolve or transcend the core conflict by the story's end? What philosophical idea or theme does the character suggest about the nature of reality?
- Heinlein, "They," conflict: What is the primary cause and motivation of the story? What tension must be traversed? How is the main character's inner conflict resolved, or not? How is the external plot conflict resolved, or not? What philosophical idea or theme does the story's core conflict suggest about the nature of reality?
- Borges, "The Library of Babel," setting: Where and when does the story take place? How does the library affect the people in general as well as the main character in particular? In other words, how do characters in the story respond to the library? What philosophical idea or theme does the setting suggest about the nature of reality?
- Borges, "The Library of Babel," character: Who is in the story, and what do we learn about them? What conflicts or issues do the characters have? Do the characters resolve or transcend the core conflict by the story's end? What philosophical idea or theme do the characters suggest about the nature of reality?
- Borges, "The Library of Babel," conflict: What is the primary cause and motivation of the story? What tension must be traversed? Is the main character's inner conflicts resolved, or not? Is the external plot conflict resolved, or not? What philosophical idea or theme does the story's core conflict suggest about the nature of reality?
3. Brainstorming the Philosophical Essay
Spend five minutes on your own brainstorming a possible topic for the upcoming philosophical paper by answering the following questions.
- Select a short story or film from the syllabus up to February 23
- Heinlein, "They"
- Borges, "The Libary of Babel"
- Bradbury, "The World the Children Made"
- Gibson, "Burning Chrome"
- Inception
- Leiber, "Catch That Zeppelin!"
- Dick, "Impostor"
- Dick, "The Minority Report"
- Dick, "We Can Remember It for You Wholesale"
- Dark City
- What philosophical question(s) does the short story or film pose?
- What philosophical conflicts or debates does the short story or film illustrate?
- To what philosophical conclusions does the short story or film come?
- Which two philosophical essays from the syllabus up to February 23 include concepts that are aptly applied in the short story or film?
- Schwitzgebel and Bakker, "Reinstalling Eden: Happiness on a Hard Drive"
- Bostrom, "Are You in a Computer Simulation?"
- Plato, excerpt from The Republic
- Descartes, excerpt from The Meditations on First Philosophy
- Chalmers, "The Matrix as Metaphysics"
- Dennett, "Where Am I?"
- Olson, "Personal Identity"
- Parfit, "Divided Minds and the Nature of Persons"
- Kurzweil, "Who Am I? What Am I?"
- Huemer, "Free Will and Determinism in Minority Report"
- Goldman, excerpt from "The Book of Life"
Next, find a partner and spend ten minutes sharing and evaluating each others' answers to the above questions.
4. Developing a Thesis and Outline for the Philosophical Essay
Divide into groups of three. Using ideas from the In Class Activity: Brainstorming the Philosophical Essay (or determining the philosophical questions, conflicts, and conclusions from a different short story or film on the syllabus) and applying the The Thesis Sentence page, compose a potential thesis for the Philosophical Essay, one that makes a claim about the philosophical meaning of the literary work, defines the scope of the argument about the literary meaning and philosophical concepts, and shapes the argument. Then, develop an outline that breaks down and proves component claims of the thesis. We'll share a couple of thesis statements and outlines at the end of class.
5. Practicing MLA Style
According to the Online Writing Lab at Purdue, formal essays require a standard style in order to
- Provide your readers with cues they can use to follow your ideas more efficiently and to locate information of interest to them
- Allow readers to focus more on your ideas by not distracting them with unfamiliar or complicated formatting
- Establish your credibility or ethos in the field by demonstrating an awareness of your audience and their needs as fellow researchers (particularly concerning the citing of references) ("MLA Overview and Workshop")
Your reader cannot focus on your essay's ideas when she is distracted by unconventional or careless formatting. Moreover, your essay will lose credibility because it does not indicate awareness or concern for standards. Unless or until you are comfortable writing in MLA format, I strongly recommend that you not only use an MLA formatted template for writing and submitting papers, such as this one, but also refer to an MLA guide and perform an MLA checklist before submitting a paper, such as this guide and checklist. Today, you're going to practice MLA style in advance of the first formal essay. Open up a new document and respond to the following questions. After a few minutes, you'll share your answers.
- Running Header: What does the running header consist of and where is it located?
- Font: What font and font size should the essay use, including in the running header and Works Cited page?
- Margins: What margins should the essay use?
- Heading: What four items make up the essay's heading?
- Title: Where is the essay title located? Should it be boldfaced, italicized, underlined, or put in quotes?
- Spacing: What is the line spacing of the entire essay, including between paragraphs and in block quotes?
- Spacing: Does your word-processing program automatically adjust the line spacing between paragraph?
- Titles of Works: Should the titles of books and films be put in italics or quotation marks? Should the title of essays and short stories be put in italics or quotation marks?
- Quotation, Part I—Introduction: Select and introduce a passage from Ray Kurzweil's "Who Am I? What Am?"
- Quotation, Part II—Style: Does the selected passage require in-text quotation format or block quotation format? Style the passage accordingly.
- Parenthetical Citation: Provide a parenthetical citation for the quoted passage.
- Quotation Explanation: Explain or interpret the passage.
- Works Cited: Compose a Works Cited entry for Ray Kurzweil's "Who Am I? What Am I?"
6. Composing an Annotation
Since the upcoming research project requires you to read and annotate a book, today, let's practice writing annotations. First, divide into group and elect a secretary to record your 75-100 word answers to the following questions:
- identify the question, issue, or topic that the essay is investigating;
- define the essay's main idea or conclusion; and
- explain how the essay helps your philosophical understanding of the topic.
Here are the groups:
- Clark, "Cyborgs Unplugged"
- Kurzweil, "Superintelligence and Singularity"
- Chalmers, "The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis"
- Schneider, "Alien Minds"
7. Small Group Activity: Questioning Humanity
Today, let's divide spend 15 minutes discussing the following questions about robots and humanity in your group's short story assigned from the three stories we read today. Students who are scheduled to respond to the stories will report their response and their group's discussions.
Here are the stories and respondents:
- Isaac Asimov, "The Bicentennial Man"
- James Causey, "The Show Must Go On"
- Brian W. Aldiss, "Who Can Replace a Man?"
Here are the questions:
- How are robots characterized in the story, i.e., what is their core trait?
- How are humans characterized in the story, i.e., what is their core trait?
- What is the core conflict in the story and how is it resolved?
- What does the story say about humanity?
8. Composing an Annotation, Redux
After discussing Blade Runner as a class, break into groups in order to practice writing an annotation for the Research Project. Each 75-100 word annotation should summarize and evaluate Deborah Knight and George McKnight's scholarly journal article "What Is It to Be Human? Blade Runner and Dark City" by
- identifying the question, issue, or topic that the source is investigating,
- defining the source's thesis or conclusion regarding Blade Runner, and
- explaining how the essay helps your literary and philosophical understanding of Blade Runner.
After returning to the large group Zoom room, submit your annotation via Chat.
9. AI Ethics
Let's break into groups to discuss the key issues involving artificial intelligence and ethics.
- In Isaac Asimov's short story "The Last Question," what is the last question and why do the characters consistently ask it? What are the AI's two answers to the last question and what do those answers suggest about human life and meaning?
- In Susan Leigh Anderson's "Asimov's 'Three Laws of Robotics' and Machine Metaethics," how are machine metaethics and moral standing defined? What is Anderson's conclusion regarding AI ethics?
- In Susan Leigh Anderson's "Asimov's 'Three Laws of Robotics' and Machine Metaethics," how is personhood defined? What is Anderson's conclusion regarding AI ethics?
- In Nick Bostrom's "The Control Problem," what are the two agency problems? What is Bostrom's main idea regarding AI ethics?
- In Nick Bostrom's "The Control Problem," what are some methods to control artificial intelligence? What is Bostom's main idea regarding AI ethics?
10. The Philosophy of Time Travel
Let's break into groups to discuss the key issues of the philosophy of time travel.
- Bradbury, "A Sound of Thunder": What is the butterfly effect? What does the short story suggest about the ethics of time travel?
- Sider, "Time": What is the space-time theory? What are some arguments against the space-time theory?
- Lewis, "The Paradoxes of Time Travel": Define external time, personal time, and extended personal time. What is the Grandfather Paradox?
- Deutsch and Lockwood, "The Quantum Physics of Time Travel": What is a closed timelike curve (CTC)? What is the difference between classical physics and quantum physics? What is the multiverse picture of reality?
- Hanley, "Miracles and Wonders: Science Fiction as Epistemology": What is hypertime? How does Hanley define the supernatural?
Response
Written Component: GeorgiaVIEW Response
The written response compels you to practice responding to philosophical or literary ideas
If you are scheduled to respond to a philosophical text, summarize and evaluate—appreciate and interrogate—one of the philosophical readings for the scheduled day. What is the main idea of the text and how does it function in human life? What questions do you have of the main idea and how do you assess the value and validity of the idea? Include 2-3 questions for class discussion.
If you are scheduled to respond to a science fiction short story or film, analyze the characters and conflicts and posit what main thematic and philosophical ideas the story or film suggests. Avoid plot summary. What are the core issues of the work, and with what philosophical concepts does the work tarry? How do you respond or answer back to the ideas posed by the story? Include 2-3 questions for class discussion.
Oral Component: Informal Presentation
The informal presentation compels you to participate in and direct class discussion.
Without simply reading your written response, you will also be responsible for a brief, informal presentation, which should either introduce the philosophical essay by defining key points and terms and main ideas and broaching issues for class discussion or introduce the short story/film by explaining key characters and conflicts and themes and broaching questions for class discussion.
Due Dates
- Your written assignment will be due in both GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Response and GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Discussions > Response Papers and Discussion Questions two days before we are scheduled to discuss the work. (Note: Responses will be penalized one letter grade for each day, not class period, that they are turned in late. It is your responsibility to check the sign up schedule and complete the assignment on time.)
- Your informal presentation will be due on the day we discuss the text in class. This date is approximate for we will sometimes fall a day behind. (Note: Failing to present the text to the class without providing a valid absence excuse will result in a one letter grade penalty.)
- I will return your graded assignment to you in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Response approximately one week after we discuss the article in class. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I am unable to return graded assignments to you unless and until you submit them to the Assignment dropbox.
- For example, we are scheduled to discuss Leiber's "Catch That Zeppelin!" and Dick's "Impostor" on Tuesday, February 16. Therefore, someone's written response will be due in GeorgiaVIEW by Sunday, February 14; and that person will be able to respond to either Leiber or Dick. In class on Tuesday, February 16, that student will informally present on the main ideas and issues of the text. I will return the graded response to her the following week in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Response. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless and until you upload it to the Dropbox. Here's how to calculate your course grade.
Parameters
- Length: 2-3 pages for the response paper, 2-3 discussion questions, 5-10 minutes for the informal presentation
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due Dates:
- Your written response will be due in two places
two days before we are scheduled to discuss a text in class.
- GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Response (this allows your peers to see your response and discussion questions)
- GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Discussions > Response Papers and Discussion Questions (this allows your professor to return your graded work
- Your informal presentation will be due on the day we are scheduled to discuss the text in class.
- If you fail to submit the response to GeorgiaVIEW the day before the informal presentation, you will not be allowed to present and you will fail the assignment. It is your responsibility to check the sign up schedule and complete the assignment on time.
- Your written response will be due in two places
two days before we are scheduled to discuss a text in class.
- Grades: You will be graded on your ability to analyze the main ideas of the texts as well as informally present those ideas to the class. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Response approximately one week after you present to the class. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless and until you upload it to the Dropbox. Here's how to calculate your course grade.
Sign Up
For complete author, title, and location information of the assigned text, check the syllabus and note that the oral date corresponds with the syllabus schedule date.
Written Date |
Oral Date |
Text |
2:00 p.m. Student |
3:30 p.m. Student |
---|---|---|---|---|
S, 1-24 |
T, 1-26 |
Schwitzgebel, Bostrom, Plato, Descartes, or Chalmers |
1 Griffin Peavy | |
T, 1-26 |
R, 1-28 |
Heinlein or Borges |
2 | |
S, 1-31 |
T, 2-2 |
Bradbury |
3 Tori Johnson | Catie Sander |
Gibson |
4 Madison Mevers | Keenan Finneran | ||
T, 2-2 |
R, 2-4 |
Inception |
5 Addison Resh | Kaylin Carter |
S, 2-7 |
R, 2-9 |
Dennett, Olson, or Parfit |
6 Simon Roode | Sean Marsh |
T, 2-9 |
R, 2-11 |
Kurzweil or Huemer |
7 Gus Dunn | Alex Heller |
S, 2-14 |
T, 2-16 |
Leiber or Dick, "Impostor" |
8 Faith Ussery | Malik Farrakhan |
T, 2-16 |
R, 2-18 |
Dick, "We Can Remember Wholesale" |
9 RJ Collier | Samuel Corry |
S, 2-21 |
T, 2-23 |
Dark City |
10 Buffy Lewis | Jake Chace |
S, 2-28 |
T, 3-2 |
Asimov, Clark, or Class |
11 | Brooke Judd |
T, 3-2 |
R, 3-4 |
Kurzweil, Chalmers, or Schneider |
12 DJ Adebonojo | Annalise Ray |
T, 3-9 |
R, 3-11 |
Asimov |
13 Carter Barfield | Anya Ricketson |
Causey or Aldiss |
14 | Taylor Almazan | ||
S, 3-14 |
T, 3-16 |
Blade Runner |
15 Christian Patrick | Sheraden Martin |
T, 3-16 |
R, 3-18 |
Annas or Schneider |
16 Christian Culver | Andrew Kafati |
S, 3-21 |
T, 3-23 |
Anderson or Bostrom |
17 | |
T, 3-23 |
R, 3-25 |
Le Guin |
18 Emma Dixon | Angelina Ochoa |
Jemisin |
19 Peyton Doran | Lauren Mattson | ||
S, 3-28 |
T, 3-30 |
Wells |
20 Ethan Hadaway | Claudia Hawkins |
S, 4-4 |
T, 4-6 |
21 Jack Carter | Zoey Gagnon | |
T, 4-6 |
R, 4-8 |
Golub or Jiang |
22 Carter Foley | Jacob Hawkes |
S, 4-11 |
T, 4-13 |
Derecho or Lamerichs |
23 Noah Cantrell | |
T, 4-20 |
R, 4-22 |
Sider, Lewis, Deutsch, or Henley |
24 Rory Norville | Matt Norton |
S, 4-25 |
T, 4-27 |
Heinlein or Spinrad |
25 Adeline Lunsford (Spinrad) | Elaina Perez |
26 Barbara Jefferson (Heinlein) | ||||
T, 4-27 |
R, 4-29 |
Twelve Monkeys |
26 Alex Sanchez | Sami Dilisio |
Ava Thomas |
Philosophical Essay
We have discussed the nature of reality and the self with the help of philosophers such as Schwitzgebel and Bakker, Bostrom, Plato, Descartes, Chalmers, Dennett, Olson, Parfit, Kurzweil, Huemer, and Goldman. As a class, we have applied their philosophical concepts to short stories by Heinlein, Borges, Bradbury, Gibson, Leiber, and Dick as well as the films Inception and Dark City. Many of you have written philosophical or literary responses to these texts. For the first formal paper, you will interpret a short story or film through the lens of a philosophical concept in a 4-5 page essay. Choose a short story or film on the syllabus up to Thursday, February 25. Write a well-focused, well-organized, thesis-driven essay, formatted in MLA style, that combines philosophical and literary analysis of the short story or film, making sure to incorporate pertinent ideas from at least two of the philosophical texts we have read so far. Beside quoting and analyzing significant passages from both philosophical and literary texts, your essay should answer the following questions: What philosophical question(s) does the text pose? What philosophical concept(s) does the text convey? What conflict(s) and theme(s) does the text suggest, and how do the conflict(s) and theme(s) apply the philosophical questions and ideas?
Parameters
- Length: 4-5 pages
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due: GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Philosophical Essay on Thursday, February 25
- Grades: Your essay will be graded on thesis, organization, understanding of the philosophical concepts and questions, and literary analysis. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Philosophical Essay approximately one to two weeks after submission. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless and until you upload it to the assignment dropbox. Here's how to calculate your course grade.
Research Project
You will annotate the essays in an edited book collection from Wiley's The Blackwell Philosophy and Pop Culture Series or Open Court Publishing Company's Popular Culture and Philosophy Series about a science fiction or fantasy novel, film, comic book, or video game. These books are called secondary sources that critically comment upon the primary text of the novel, film, etc.
After signing up below, you can request your book from the library using GIL or interlibrary loan. Alternatively you can purchase your book through an online bookstore. Note that GIL takes approximately one week to receive a book, interlibrary loan usually takes two weeks, and online book stores ship in two days to two weeks.
While a normal annotated bibliography requires you to summarize books, book chapters, and scholarly journal articles for a research paper, the bibliography you annotate in this class focuses solely on the chapters in your scholarly book on a science fiction or fantasy product. You should annotate at least 10 critical essays from the collection. Each 75-100 word annotation should summarize and evaluate a research source by
- identifying the philosophical issue or question that the essay is investigating,
- defining the secondary source's thesis or conclusion regarding the primary text's philosophical theme, and
- explaining how the essay helps your understanding of the primary text.
After you've written the annotations, write 1-2 pages summarizing the dominant philosophical trends and issues you see running through the entire book.
Parameters
- Length: at least ten (10) 75-100 word entries followed by a 1-2 page summary of the philosophical trends and debates
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due Date: GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Research Project on Thursday, April 1.
- Grades: Your assignment will be graded on the quality of annotations and ability to summarize the philosophical debates. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Research Project one or two weeks after submission. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless and until you upload it to the dropbox. Here's how to calculate your course grade.
Sign Up
Book | Series | 2:00 Student | 3:30 Student |
---|---|---|---|
Alice in Wonderland |
Blackwell |
1 Buffy Lewis | |
Alien |
Blackwell |
2 Faith Ussery | |
Avatar |
Blackwell |
3 Christian Culver | 1 Brooke Judd |
The Avengers |
Blackwell |
4 Jack Carter | |
Batman |
Blackwell |
5 Carter Barfield | |
Battlestar Galactica |
Blackwell |
||
BioShock |
Blackwell |
2 Lauren Mattson | |
Black Mirror |
Blackwell |
6 Simon Roode | |
Dungeons and Dragons |
Blackwell |
3 Alex Heller | |
Ender's Game |
Blackwell |
4 Malik Farrakhan | |
Final Fantasy |
Blackwell |
||
Game of Thrones |
Blackwell |
7 Addie Resh | 5 Sean Marsh |
Green Lantern |
Blackwell |
||
Harry Potter |
Blackwell |
6 Sheraden Martin | |
Heroes |
Blackwell |
||
The Hunger Games |
Blackwell |
8 Ethan Hadaway | 7 Sami Dillisio |
The Hobbit |
Blackwell |
8 Zoey Gagnon | |
Inception |
Blackwell |
||
Iron Man |
Blackwell |
||
Lost |
Blackwell |
||
Lost (2: Ultimate) |
Blackwell |
||
Spider-Man |
Blackwell |
9 Barbara Jefferson | |
Star Trek |
Blackwell |
||
Superman |
Blackwell |
||
Supernatural |
Blackwell |
9 Evangelina Ochoa | |
Terminator |
Blackwell |
||
True Blood |
Blackwell |
10 Kaylin Carter | |
Twilight |
Blackwell |
11 Ava Thomas | |
The Walking Dead |
Blackwell |
10 Addie Lunsford | |
Watchmen |
Blackwell |
||
Westworld |
Blackwell |
||
X-Men |
Blackwell |
||
Avengers Infinity Saga |
Open |
12 Catie Sander | |
Batman and Superman |
Open |
||
Battlestar Galactica |
Open |
||
Blade Runner 2049 |
Open |
11 Alex Sanchez | |
Buffy the Vampire Slayer |
Open |
||
The Chronicles of Narnia |
Open |
||
Deadpool |
Open |
12 Noah Cantrell | 13 Jacob Hawkes |
Divergent |
Open |
13 Rory Norville | |
Doctor Who |
Open |
14 Emma Dixon | |
Doctor Who (2: More) |
Open |
14 Anya Ricketson | |
Dune |
Open |
15 Carter Foley | |
Dungeons and Dragons |
Open |
||
Ender's Game |
Open |
15 Andrew Kafati | |
Frankenstein |
Open |
||
Futurama |
Open |
||
The Golden Compass |
Open |
||
Halo |
Open |
||
Handmaid's Tale |
Open |
16 Griffin Peavy | |
Harry Potter |
Open |
16 Annalise Ray | |
His Dark Materials |
Open |
||
Inception |
Open |
17 Jack Chace | |
Iron Man vs Captain America |
Open |
17 Gus Dunn | 18 Keenan Finneran |
Jurassic Park |
Open |
||
Legend of Zelda |
Open |
18 Tori Johnson | |
The Lord of the Rings |
Open |
||
The Man in the High Castle |
Open |
||
The Matrix |
Open |
||
The Matrix (2: More) |
Open |
||
Neil Gaiman |
Open |
||
Philip K. Dick |
Open |
||
Planet of the Apes |
Open |
||
Rick and Morty |
Open |
19 Samuel Corry | |
Star Trek |
Open |
||
Star Wars |
Open |
19 Christian Patrick | |
Superheroes |
Open |
||
Supervillains |
Open |
20 Taylor Almazan | |
Transformers |
Open |
||
Twilight Zone |
Open |
21 Claudia Hawkins | |
The Walking Dead |
Open |
||
The Wizard of Oz |
Open |
||
World of Warcraft |
Open |
||
X-Men |
Open |
20 Madison Mevers | 22 Elaina Perez |
Zombies, Vampires |
Open |
Learning Beyond the Classroom Project
At this point in the course, you have informally responded to a philosophical or literary reading and formally composed a full-length essay proving how a short story or film applies philosophical concepts. For the learning beyond the classroom component of the course, you can either write a reflective essay about your participation in a science fiction and fantasy social activity or record a 30 podcast, with two classmates, that analyzes a science fiction short story, novel, film, or television episode.
Option 1: Reflective Essay
First, participate in a science fiction and fantasy social activity—such as a role playing board game like Dungeons & Dragons, massively multi-player online role playing game (MMORPG) like World of Warcraft, an online fan convention like Dragon Con, an online cosplay event, or an online fan fiction community—subject to professor approval, and then write an essay critically analyzing the experience. For instance, you could join a guild in World of Warcraft compose a reflective essay thinking about how the experience affected your sense of self and/or reality, in the philosophical ways we've been discussing, like Golub and Lamerichs', to support your ideas. Your topic must be approved one month before the essay is due; therefore, submit three possible science fiction and fantasy participatory experiences on Tuesday, March 16. Your essay has three goals: first, describe and analyze the social experience you attended and/or participated in; second, reflect upon the experience by making a claim about the key philosophical ideas that are in play; and, third, incorporate ideas from two applicable philosophical essays from our course.
Option 2: Podcast
With two other students from the course, record a 25-35 minute podcast episode that discusses a science fiction short story, novel, film, or television episode not studied in class, subject to professor approval. Be sure to address not only literary (character, conflict, symbol, theme, etc.) and/or film elements (shots, scene, camera, lighting, etc.) but also philsophical issues such as reality, self, mind, technology, and/or time travel, etc. Your science fiction text must be approved one month before the podcast is due; therefore, submit three possible science fiction texts, along with the names of your three group members, on Tuesday, March 16. Your podcast has three goals: first describe and analyze the text from a literary perspective; second, apply the key philosophical ideas that are present in the text; and, third, incorporate ideas from two applicable philosophical essays from our course.
Parameters
- Length
- Reflective Essay: 4-5 pages
- Podcast: 25-35 minutes
- Format:
- Due Dates
- List of Three Possible Topics: GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Learning Beyond the Classroom Topics on Tuesday, March 16
- Reflective Essay: GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Reflective Essay on Thursday, April 15
- Podcast: GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Podcast on Thursday, April 15
- Grades: Your reflective essay will be graded on your analysis of the experience, your reflections on the philosophical concepts, and your integration of two supporting philosophical articles. Alternatively, your podcast episode will be graded on your analysis of the science fiction text and your understanding and integration of philosophical understanding. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Reflective Essay or Podcast approximately two weeks after submission. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless and until you upload it to the dropbox. Here's how to calculate your course grade.
Topics
2:00 Student | Option | Topic |
---|---|---|
DJ Adebonojo |
|
|
Carter Barfield |
Essay |
Elder Scrolls Online |
Noah Cantrell |
Essay |
World of Warcraft |
Jack Carter |
Podcast |
Star Wars (one Star Wars film, with Barbara Jefferson and Christian Patrick) |
Christian Culver |
Essay |
DC Universe Online |
Emma Dixon |
||
Peyton Doran |
||
Gus Dunn |
Podcast |
Donnie Darko (with Taylor Almazan and Simon Roode) |
Carter Foley |
Podcast |
I, Robot (with Addie Lunsford and Faith Ussery) |
Ethan Hadaway |
Essay |
RPG |
Barbara Jefferson |
Podcast |
Star Wars (one Star Wars film, with Jack Carter and Christian Patrick) |
Tori Johnson |
Essay |
Magic: The Gathering |
Buffy Lewis |
Essay |
Magic: The Gathering |
Addie Lunsford |
Podcast |
I, Robot (with Carter Foley and Faith Ussery) |
Madison Mevers |
Essay |
Magic: The Gathering |
Rory Norville |
||
Christian Patrick |
Podcast |
Star Wars (one Star Wars film, with Jack Carter and Barbara Jefferson) |
Griffin Peavy |
Essay |
Cherry Blossom Shrek Trivia and Cosplay |
Addie Resh |
Essay |
Magic: The Gathering |
Simon Roode |
Podcast |
Donnie Darko (with Taylor Almazan and Gus Dunn) |
Alex Sanchez |
Essay |
Black Desert Online |
Faith Ussery |
Podcast |
I, Robot (with Carter Foley and Addie Lunsford) |
3:30 Student | Option | Topic |
Taylor Almazan |
Podcast |
Donnie Darko (with Gus Dunn and Simon Roode) |
Kaylin Carter |
Essay |
Wattpad |
Jack Chace |
Essay |
online fan fiction convention |
Samuel Corry |
Essay |
Grand Theft Auto Role Play |
Samantha Dilisio |
Essay |
Wattpad |
Malik Farrakhan |
Podcast |
Rick and Morty episode (partners with Keenan Finneran and Sheraden Martin) |
Keenan Finneran |
Podcast |
Rick and Morty episode (partners with Malik Farrakhan and Sheraden Martin) |
Zoey Gagnon |
Essay |
Star Wars fanfiction |
Jacob Hawkes |
Essay |
The Sims |
Claudia Hawkins |
Essay |
Dungeons and Dragons |
Alex Heller |
||
Brooke Judd |
Essay |
World of Warcraft |
Andrew Kafati |
Essay |
Destiny 2 |
Sean Marsh |
Essay |
Dungeons & Dragons |
Sheraden Martin |
Podcast |
Rick and Morty episode (partners with Malik Farrakhan and Keenan Finneran) |
Lauren Mattson |
Essay |
Dungeons & Dragons |
Matthew Norton |
||
Angelina Ochoa |
Essay |
Archive of Our Own (Supernatural) |
Elaina Perez |
Essay |
Dungeons & Dragons |
Annalise Ray |
Essay |
World of Warcraft |
Anya Ricketson |
Essay |
Starfinder |
Catie Sander |
Essay |
fanfiction |
Ava Thomas |
Essay |
fanfiction |
Exam
You have responded both informally and formally to literature and philosophy, you have researched the philosophy informing science fiction and related genres, and you have completed a learning beyond the classroom project that entailed either reflecting upon a participatory science fiction or fantasy experience or producing a podcast about a science fiction work. For the final assignment, you will be examined on the literature and philosophy we have collectively studied on the syllabus after the formal philosophical essay (Tuesday, March 2 through Thursday, April 29; the exam does not include learning beyond the classroom projects and reflective experiences). Here is the list of scifi and philosophical texts to choose from on the exam:
SciFi Texts
- Asimov, "Robot Dreams"
- Asimov, "The Bicentennial Man"
- Causey, "The Show Must Go On"
- Aldiss, "Who Can Replace a Man?"
- Blade Runner
- Asimov, "The Last Question"
- Le Guin, "The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas"
- Jemisin, "The Ones Who Stay and Fight"
- Wells, The Island of Doctor Moreau
- Metropolis
- Bradbury, "A Sound of Thunder"
- Heinlein, "All You Zombies—"
- Spinrad, "The Weed of Time"
- Twelve Monkeys
Philosophy Texts
- Clark, "A Brain Speaks"
- Clark, Cyborgs Unplugged"
- Kurzweil, "Superintelligence and Singularity"
- Chalmers, "The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis"
- Schneider, "Alien Minds"
- Annas, "The Man on the Moon"
- Schneider, "Mindscan: Transcending and Enhancing the Human Brain"
- Leslie, "The Doomsday Argument"
- Anderson, "Asimov's 'Three Laws of Robotics' and Machine Metaethics"
- Bostrom, "The Control Problem"
- Golub, "Being in the World (of Warcraft): Raiding, Realism, and Knowledge..."
- Jiang, "'I Never Know What to Expect': Aleatory Identity Play in Fortnite and Its Implications for Multimodal Composition"
- Derecho, "Archontic Literature: A Definition, a History, and...Fan Fiction"
- Lamerichs, "Stranger Than Fiction: Fan Identity in Cosplay"
- Sider, "Time"
- Lewis, "The Paradoxes of Time Travel"
- Deutsch and Haywood, "The Quantum Physics of Time Travel"
- Hanley, "Miracles and Wonders: Science Fiction and Time Travel"
In class on Tuesday, April 27, we will generate topics from which the questions will be generated.
Topics
2:00 Section
- definitions and criteria of the human
- paradoxes of time travel
- the ethics of scifi stories
- issues of identity and representation in scifi media
- issues of exclusion and inclusion in scifi media
3:30 Section
- cyborgs and clones, robots and androids
- paradoxes of time travel
- morality of science and technology
- science fiction and fantasy participatory experiences
- the dangers of advancing technology
- superintelligence and singularity
Questions
The questions will be posted here on Thursday, April 29. Answer two of the six questions below, using scifi and philosophy texts from the list above to answer the questions. Do not use a scifi or philosophy text in more than one essay, i.e., use only a text one time. Compose a comparative thesis that bridges the texts being discussed. Prove your thesis with demonstrated knowledge of the key issues and ideas in the texts. Be sure to both compare and contrast the texts' pertinent ideas.
2:00 Section
- Humanity and Identity: Using three scifi and philosophy texts (at least one scifi and at least one philosophy), discuss how scientific advances in biotechnology (cloning, cyborgs) and/or robotics (robots, androids) affect and construct our understanding of the nature of human identity. What is the scifi theme, what is the philosophical thesis, and how do their core ideas about identity compare and contrast?
- Theories and Stories of Time Travel: Using three scifi and philosophy texts (at least one scifi and at least one philosophy), debate the theories and paradoxes of time travel. What is the scifi theme, what is the philosophical thesis, and how do their core ideas about time travel compare and contrast?
- Morality and Ethics: Using three scifi and philosophy texts (at least one scifi and at least one philosophy), debate the moral and ethical implications underlying a single scifi issue such as dystopias, time travel, cyborgs, clones, androids, or genetic engineering. What is the scifi theme, what is the philosophical thesis, and how do their core ideas about morality compare and contrast?
- Identification and Belonging: Using three philosophy texts (at least one scifi and at least one philosophy), discuss how science fiction stories and films, and/or science fiction participatory experiences such as role-playing games, cosplay, and fanfiction invite audience identification with scifi characters and create a sense of belonging.
- Exclusion and Inclusion: Using three scifi and philosophy texts (at least one scifi and at least one philosophy), discuss how science fiction stories and films, and/or science fiction participatory experiences such as role-playing games, cosplay, and fanfiction exclude certain audiences and fans, and then explore how those same media and events might be more inclusive.
3:30 Section
- Humanity and Identity: Using three scifi and philosophy texts (at least one scifi and at least one philosophy), discuss how scientific advances in biotechnology (cloning, cyborgs) and/or robotics (robots, androids) affect and construct our understanding of the nature of human identity. What is the scifi theme, what is the philosophical thesis, and how do their core ideas about identity compare and contrast?
- Theories and Stories of Time Travel: Using three scifi and philosophy texts (at least one scifi and at least one philosophy), debate the theories and paradoxes of time travel. What is the scifi theme, what is the philosophical thesis, and how do their core ideas about time travel compare and contrast?
- Morality and Ethics: Using three scifi and philosophy texts (at least one scifi and at least one philosophy), debate the moral and ethical implications underlying a single scifi issue such as dystopias, time travel, cyborgs, clones, androids, or genetic engineering. What is the scifi theme, what is the philosophical thesis, and how do their core ideas about morality compare and contrast?
- SciFi Fan Culture: Using three philosophy texts, discuss the fluctuations of identity or permutations of reality across two different kinds of fan experiences like video games, cosplay, or fan fiction. For example, you could compare and contrast cosplay and video games using Lamerichs, Jiang, and Golub.
- Humanity and Technology: Using three scifi and philosophy texts (at least one scifi and at least one philosophy), discuss how scientific and technological advancements enhance and/or endanger humanity. What is the scifi theme, what is the philosophical thesis, and how do their core ideas about enhancement and endangerment compare and contrast?
- The Limits of the Human Mind: Using three scifi and philosophy texts (at least one scifi and at least one philosophy), explore how science and technology test the limits of the human mind. What is the scifi theme, what is the philosophical thesis, and how do their core ideas about the human mind compare and contrast?
Parameters
- Length: 2 essays of 3-4 pages each, submitted in one 6-8 page file
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due: GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Exam on Thursday, May 6
- Grades: Your exam will be graded on the quality of your comparative theses, as well as your knowledge and analysis of the topic and essays. Final grades will be available in PAWS after May 12. In order to read and assess all the exams and papers in my four classes by the final grade deadline, I will not be giving feedback on final projects this semester. If you want to know your exam grade, request it in the dialogue box in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Exam by Thursday, May 6 and it will be returned there by Wednesay, May 11. I am happy to provide exam feedback at the beginning of fall semester if you email me to set up a conference. Here's how to calculate your course grade.