Assignments
GC2Y 2000 Global Horror, Fall 2021
Sectopm 17: 2:00-3:40 p.m., Terrell Hall 405
Section 16 Honors: 4:00-5:40 p.m., Ennis Hall 201
Film Availability
This chart provides links to our class's required films that are available through links from JustWatch (a clearinghouse of film and television streaming sites), Kanopy (free streaming) GCSU Library (4 hour course reserves), and the Internet Archive (free download and streaming). Check Drew's Script-O-Rama and The Internet Movie Script Database for screenplays and transcripts to use as a a helpful reference for dialogue; however, if you write about the film, you should verify dialogue from the film itself.
Required Films | Availability |
---|---|
Alien |
|
The Babadook |
|
Don't Torture a Duckling |
|
Freaks |
|
Godzilla (1954) |
Screening: Wednesday, September 22, 6:30-8:30 p.m., A&S 342 |
The Golem: How He Came into the World(1920) |
|
The Haunted Castle |
|
Häxan |
|
The Horror of Dracula |
|
The Host |
|
The Infernal Cauldron |
|
Kwaidan |
|
Nang Nak |
|
The Phantom Carriage |
|
Pulse (2001) |
Screening: Wednesday, September 8, 6:30-8:30 p.m., A&S 342 |
[REC] |
Screening: Monday, September 20, 6:00-8:00 p.m., A&S 342 |
Repulsion |
|
Shivers |
|
Recommended Films |
Availability |
The Bird with the Crystal Plumage |
|
Blood and Black Lace |
|
The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari |
|
The Curse of Frankenstein |
|
The Devil's Backbone |
|
Halloween (1978) |
|
Island of Lost Souls |
|
Kuntilanak (2018) |
|
Nosferatu |
|
Planet of the Vampires |
|
Pulse (2006) |
|
Quarantine |
|
Revenge of the Pontianak |
|
The Ring |
|
Ringu |
|
Rosemary's Baby (1968) |
|
The Shout |
|
Tarantula |
|
The Tenant (1976) |
|
The Thing from Another World |
|
White Zombie |
In Class Activities
1. Atmosphere and Allegory
Robert Spadoni argues that narrative and atmosphere are tied together; and Christopher Sharrett discusses how influential horror film's allegorical critiques of ideologies, such as capitalism and patriarchy, are unraveled either by the films themselves or the horror genre more generally. Today, let's apply what we've learned from the atmosphere and social allegory articles to films we've viewed in our class. Individual students will count off, think about the questions that correspond to their number for approximately five minutes, and report their findings to the class.
- How does narrative contribute to the atmosphere of Alien? Talk about a scene that illustrates the tie between narrative and atmosphere.
- What social allegory does Alien present about capitalism and patriarchy? What elements of the film affirm the critique, what elements of the film unravel the critique?
- How does narrative contribute to the atmosphere of Godzilla? Talk about a scene that illustrates the tie between narrative and atmosphere.
- What social allegory does Godzilla present about science, technology, and Western power? What elements of the film affirm the critique, what elements of the film unravel the critique?
- How does narrative contribute to the atmosphere of [REC]? Talk about a scene that illustrates the tie between narrative and atmosphere.
- What social allegory does [REC] present about the Other and difference? What elements of the film affirm the critique, what elements of the film unravel the critique?
- How does narrative contribute to the atmosphere of Pulse? Talk about a scene that illustrates the tie between narrative and atmosphere.
- What social allegory does Pulse present about media and technology? What elements of the film affirm the critique, what elements of the film unravel the critique?
- How does narrative contribute to the atmosphere of The Horror of Dracula? Talk about a scene that illustrates the tie between narrative and atmosphere.
- What social allegory does The Horror of Dracula present about patriarchy? What elements of the film affirm the critique, what elements of the film unravel the critique?
- How does narrative contribute to the atmosphere of Freaks? Talk about a scene that illustrates the tie between narrative and atmosphere.
- What social allegory does Freaks present about normalcy, normativity, and otherness? What elements of the film affirm the critique, what elements of the film unravel the critique?
- How does narrative contribute to the atmosphere of Häxan? Talk about a scene that illustrates the tie between narrative and atmosphere.
- What social allegory does Häxan present about patriarchy? What elements of the film affirm the critique, what elements of the film unravel the critique?
2. Horror's Otherness
Today, let's apply Adam Lowenstein's understanding of James Clifford's and Robin Wood's theories of otherness in horror films to films we've already discussed in class. As a class, answer the following questions:
- How does Robin Wood define the other, summarized on page 522?
- How does Robin Wood define progressive and reactionary horror, summarized on page 522?
- How does James Clifford define ethnographic surrealism, summarized on page 521?
Individually, think through the following assigned question for five minutes and report your findings to the class.
- Who is the self and who is the other in Freaks? According to Wood, would the the film be considered progressive or reactionary? According to Clifford, does the film "locate the other in the self"?
- Who is the self and who is the other in The Horror of Dracula? According to Wood, would the the film be considered progressive or reactionary? According to Clifford, does the film "locate the other in the self"?
- Who is the self and who is the other in Shivers? According to Wood, would the the film be considered progressive or reactionary? According to Clifford, does the film "locate the other in the self"?
- Who is the self and who is the other in Alien? According to Wood, would the the film be considered progressive or reactionary? According to Clifford, does the film "locate the other in the self"?
- Who is the self and who is the other in The Host? According to Wood, would the the film be considered progressive or reactionary? According to Clifford, does the film "locate the other in the self"?
Presentation Schedule
First week of class: Sign up for two slots, one in the first half of the semester and another in the second half of the semester: one Article Summary (AS) and one Film Response (FR).
Third week of class: Sign up for one slot: Learning Beyond the Classroom Project (LB), but not in the same week as an Article Summary (AS) or Film Response (FR).
Written Due Date |
Oral Due Date |
Assignment |
2:00 Student |
4:00 Student |
---|---|---|---|---|
S, 8-21 |
M, 8-23 |
Picart |
AS |
AS |
Häxan |
FR |
FR Taylor Bash |
||
M, 8-23 |
W, 8-25 |
Telotte |
AS Harper Wall |
AS |
The Golem |
FR |
FR Jacqui Banks |
||
S, 8-28 |
M, 8-30 |
Benshoff or Petley |
AS Callie Miller |
AS |
Freaks |
FR |
FR Ellie Archer |
||
M, 8-30 |
W, 9-1 |
Worland or Hudson |
AS Meadow Etheridge |
AS Anna Durden |
The Horror of Dracula |
FR Stella Boston |
FR Abbie Reynolds |
||
M, 9-6 | W, 9-8 | Balmain |
AS Shelby Cannon |
AS Jack Howle |
Kwaidan: The Black Hair |
FR Kimmie Galka |
FR Isabella Oetting |
||
Kwaidan: The Woman/Snow |
FR Brooke Mooney |
FR Estefania Esmerio-Rivera |
||
Kwaidan: Hoichi the Earless |
FR Sierra Hart |
FR Caroline Hegwood |
||
Kwaidan: In a Cup of Tea |
FR William Bartlett |
FR Lizzy Niswonger |
||
S, 9-11 |
M, 9-13 |
McRoy |
AS Anna Case |
AS Marta Knapp |
Pulse (2001) |
FR Ashley Thomann |
FR Julia Bedell |
||
FR Avery Hobbs |
||||
M, 9-20 |
W, 9-22 |
Olney |
AS Meredith Robertson |
AS Aiden Gardner |
Kee |
AS Dylan Shelnutt |
|||
[REC] |
FR Emma Rooks |
FR Jenesis Harris |
||
FR Ava Thomas |
||||
S, 9-25 |
M, 9-27 |
Hantke |
AS Gracie Britt |
AS Alyssa Wright |
Godzilla (1954) |
FR Susie Hightower |
FR Marta Knapp |
||
FR Harper Wall |
||||
S, 10-2 |
M, 10-4 |
Hart |
AS Avery Hobbs |
AS Julia Bedell (Dumas) |
Dumas |
AS Samuel Johnson (Hart) |
|||
M, 10-4 |
W, 10-6 |
Creed |
AS Brooke Mooney |
AS Jacqui Banks |
Alien |
FR Emilia Lajewski |
FR Jack Howle |
||
FR Zecheriah O'dell |
FR Caroline Johnson |
|||
M, 10-11 |
W, 10-13 |
Sharrett or Spadoni |
AS Kenzie Youngclaus (Sharrett) |
AS Allie Cole |
AS Susie Hightower (Spadoni) |
||||
S, 10-16 |
M, 10-18 |
Humphrey |
AS Stella Boston |
AS Abbie Reynolds |
Freeland |
AS Samantha Meeks |
AS Taylor Bash |
||
M, 10-18 |
W, 10-20 |
Repulsion |
FR Anna Case |
FR Alyssa Wright |
FR Gracie Britt |
FR Aiden Gardner |
|||
S, 10-23 |
M, 10-25 |
Hill or Reyes |
AS Emma Talley |
AS Lizzy Niswonger |
M, 10-25 |
W, 10-27 |
Shivers |
FR Samantha Meeks |
FR Haley James |
FR Callie Miller |
||||
LBTC Group 1 2:00 The Platform 4:00 Funny Games |
LB Meadow Etheridge |
LB Anna Durden |
||
LB Brooke Mooney |
LB Caroline Hedgwood |
|||
LB Ashley Thomann |
LB Jack Howle |
|||
LB Harper Wall |
LB Haley James |
|||
LBTC Group 2 4:00 Train to Busan |
XXX |
LB Taylor Bash |
||
XXX |
LB Jenesis Harris |
|||
XXX |
LB Amber Hutcheson |
|||
S, 10-30 |
M, 11-1 |
Sutton |
AS Zechariah O'dell |
AS Jenesis Harris |
King |
AS Ashley Thomann |
|||
The Babadook |
FR Stella Boston |
FR Anna Durden |
||
FR Meadow Etheridge |
||||
FR Emma Talley |
||||
M, 11-1 |
W, 11-3 |
Heffernan or Hunter |
AS Matt Hamaty |
AS Isabella Oetting |
LBTC Group 3 2:00 Train to Busan 4:00 The Platform |
LB Kimmie Galka |
LB Estefania Esmerio |
||
LB Kenzie Youngclaus |
LB Caroline Johnson |
|||
XXX |
LB Lizzy Niswonger |
|||
XXX |
LB Isabella Oetting |
|||
LBTC Group 4 2:00 Veronica |
LB |
XXX |
||
LB Bella DeSalvo |
XXX |
|||
LB Callie Miller |
XXX |
|||
M, 11-8 |
Kendrick |
AS Emma Rooks |
AS Ellie Archer |
|
Clover |
AS Emilia Lajewski |
|||
M, 11-8 |
W, 11-10 |
Don't Torture a Duckling |
FR Meredith Robertson |
FR Allie Cole |
LBTC Group 5 2:00 Parasite 4:00 The Ritual |
LB Paul Bartlett |
LB Aiden Gardner |
||
LB Stella Boston |
LB Samuel Johnson |
|||
LB Gracie Britt |
LB Alyssa Wright |
|||
LBTC Group 6 2:00 The Conjuring 2 4:00 Lilie |
LB Sierra Hart |
LB Ellie Archer |
||
LB Susie Hightower |
LB Jacqui Banks |
|||
LB Zechariah O'dell |
LB Marta Knapp |
|||
M, 11-15 |
W, 11-17 |
Martin or Alaimo |
AS Sierra Hart |
AS Estefania Esmerio-Rivera |
The Host |
FR Bella DeSalvo |
FR Amber Hutcheson |
||
Dylan Shelnutt |
||||
LBTC Group 7 2:00 Veronica (2017) 4:00 Midnight Mommy (2014) |
LB Meredith Robertson |
LB Julia Bedell |
||
LB Emma Rooks |
LB Allie Cole |
|||
LB Emma Talley |
LB Abbie Reynolds |
|||
LBTC The Ritual (2017) The Devil's Backbone (2001) |
LB Samantha Meeks (individual) |
XXX |
||
LB Anna Case (with Dylan, Ava) |
XXX |
|||
LB Dylan Shelnutt (with Anna, Ava) |
XXX |
|||
LB Ava Thomas (with Anna, Dylan) |
XXX |
|||
S, 11-27 | M, 11-29 | Coleman |
AS Ava Thomas |
As Haley James |
S, 11-27 |
M, 11-29 |
Lowenstein |
AS Bella DeSalvo |
AS Caroline Hegwood |
M, 11-29 |
W, 12-1 |
Ng |
AS William Bartlett |
AS Amber Hutcheson |
Nang Nak |
FR Kenzie Youngclaus |
FR Samuel Johnson |
||
FR Matt Hamaty |
Article Summary
Written Summary
You will write an article summary and post it to GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Article Summary two days before we are scheduled to discuss the article so I have time to read your response before class. The article summary should
- be 2-3 pages long, formatted in MLA style, and submitted in Microsoft Word format,
- summarize the article's argument (if there are multiple articles on the syllabus by a single author, summarize only one),
- quote and explain one or two significant passage(s),
- define key terms,
- and include 2-3 questions for class discussion.
Informal Presentation
You will also be responsible for a brief, informal presentation. The presentation should introduce the essay by defining key points and terms (without simply reading your written summary) and broaching issues for class discussion.
Due Dates
- Your written assignment will be due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Article Summary two days before we are scheduled to discuss an article. Summaries will be penalized one letter grade for each day, not class period, that they are turned in late. It is your responsibility to check the sign up schedule and complete the assignment on time.
- Your brief, informal presentation will be due on the day we discuss the essay in class. This date is approximate for we will sometimes fall a day behind. Failing to present the article to the class without providing a valid absence excuse will result in a two letter grade penalty.
- I will return your graded assignment to you in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Article Summary approximately one week after we discuss the article in class. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I am unable to return graded assignments to you unless and until you submit them to the Assignment dropbox.
- For example, we are scheduled to discuss Picart's "The Documentary Impulse and Reel/Real Horror" on Monday, August 23. Therefore, someone's summary will be due in GeorgiaVIEW on Saturday, August 21. In class on Monday, August 23, that student will informally present the main ideas of Picart's essay. I will return the graded article summary to that student the following week in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Article Summary. Here's how to calculate your course grade.
Sign Up
The article summary, film response, and learning beyond the classroom project schedules are here.
Film Response
Written Summary
You will respond to a film and post it to GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Film Response two days before we are scheduled to discuss the film so I have time to read your response before class. The film response should
- be 2-3 pages long, formatted in MLA style, and submitted in Microsoft Word format,
- respond to the key conflicts, issues, and themes of the film,
- react to an important shot or scene,
- and include 2-3 questions for class discussion.
Informal Presentation
You will also be responsible for a brief, informal presentation. The presentation should discuss the highlights of your response (without simply reading your written summary) and broach issues for class discussion.
Due Dates
- Your written assignment will be due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Film Response two days before we are scheduled to discuss the film. Responses will be penalized one letter grade for each day, not class period, that they are turned in late. It is your responsibility to check the sign up schedule and complete the assignment on time.
- Your brief, informal presentation will be due on the day we discuss the film in class. This date is approximate for we will sometimes fall a day behind. Failing to present the response to the class without providing a valid absence excuse will result in a two letter grade penalty.
- I will return your graded assignment to you in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Film Response approximately one week after we discuss the article in class. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I am unable to return graded assignments to you unless and until you submit them to the Assignment dropbox.
- For example, we are scheduled to discuss Haxan on Monday, August 23. Therefore, someone's film response will be due in GeorgiaVIEW on Saturday, August 21. In class on Monday, August 23, that student will informally present the main points of their response. I will return the graded film response to the student the following week in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Film Response. Here's how to calculate your course grade.
Sign Up
The article summary, film response, and learning beyond the classroom project sign up and presentation schedules are here.
Comparison/Contrast Essay
We have looked at a number of early horrors films (The Phantom Carriage, Haxan, The Golem, Freaks, The Horror of Dracula, Kwaidan) with a variety of horrors (death, witches, freaks, vampires, ghosts) from a variety of countries (Sweden, Denmark, Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Japan). For the first formal paper, you will compare and contrast how horror functions in two films. You have two choices of approach.
- Option A: Compare and contrast how two films that we've viewed so far express a key trait of the horror film genre, integrating ideas from one or two of the following articles we've read so far (Smuts, Picart, Telotte, Benshoff, Petley, Worland, Hudson, Balmain, McRoy, Whittington, Tompkins) into your analysis. How does the expression of the characteristic affect the comparison of the two films' themes; in other words, how does form influence thematic content? For example, according to Smuts's review of Carroll's work, to be considered horror, a film must contain a monster. You could compare and contrast the monsters at the heart of The Phantom Carriage and Haxan, and thus compare and contrast what kind of horror films they are, as well as what kind of themes they have.
- Option B: Compare and contrast the representation of the monster (death, witches, vampires, freaks, ghosts) in a horror film that we've viewed so far with the attitude toward and portrayal of the monster in a horror film of your choice from another country. How does the representation of the monster affect the comparison of the two films' themes; in other words, how does form influence thematic content? For example, you could compare and contrast how witches are represented in Haxan (Sweden, 1922) with how they are portrayed in The Blair Witch Project (United States, 1999), and how those expressions lead to their respective themes.
Your paper must use textual evidence from the films such as but not limited to dialogue, title cards, shots, soundtrack, camera angles, and editing. Option A must also cite the text of one or more in class articles. Before you draft the paper, you will submit a thesis statement and outline, which will be reviewed by your peers. The mandatory first draft of your paper will be reviewed by your peers and graded by your professor. The optional second draft grade will replace the first draft grade.
Parameters
- Length: 4-6 pages for 2:00 section; 5-7 pages for 4:00 Honors section
- Format: Word format (I suggest using this template)
- Style: MLA style (I suggest completing this checklist)
- Due Dates: There are multiple due dates and different places to submit the paper.
- Thesis Statement and Outline: The thesis statement and outline is due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Comparison/Contrast Thesis on Wednesday, September 8 before class. Failure to submit before class will result in a one-third letter grade deduction for the final paper grade. Bring your laptop or a print out of your thesis and outline to class.
- Draft 1 (Professor Copy): The mandatory first draft is due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments> Comparison/Contrast Essay Draft 1 at any time on Monday, September 20. Failure to submit on time will result in a one-third letter grade deduction for the final paper grade.
- Draft 1 (Peer Copy): The mandatory first draft is also due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Discussions > Comparison/Contrast Essay Peer Group # at any time on Monday, September 20.
- Peer Response: The mandatory peer response session will take place on Wednesday, September 29. Failure to participate in peer response will result in a one-third letter grade deduction for the final grade of your paper.
- Draft 2 (Professor Copy): The optional second draft of the paper, with major changes highlighted and a revision statement included after the Works Cited page, is due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Comparison/Contrast Essay Draft 2 at any time on Wednesday, October 6. The second draft grade will replace the first. Failure to submit a revision statement will result in a one-third letter grade deduction for the final grade of the paper.
- Grade: Your assignment will be assessed in terms of your comparative thesis, your textual analysis of the two films, and your integration of articles from class (Option A only). Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Comparison/Contrast Essay Draft 2 approximately one week after you present to the class. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless you upload it to the Assignments dropbox.
Peer Response
Goals
The two main goals of our class is for you to learn multiple intellectual approaches to horror films and to develop a global perspective regarding the culture of horror films, and the course approaches these outcomes through analytical and research writing. Peer response sessions extend the writing process by allowing you and your peers to engage in direct oral and written dialogue about matters of analysis and research, with the ultimate goal of improving your formal papers. You have the opportunity to revise your Comparison/Contrast Essay and your Research Paper based upon comments by your peers and professor. You will provide constructive criticism to other members of the class as will they to you. Here are the peer response templates for the Comparison/Contrast Essay and the Research Paper.
Note: If a group member does not submit her paper to the GeorgiaVIEW discussion board in a format your computer can read, such as Word, at least two days before the peer response session, the rest of the group is not responsible for responding to her paper. If a group member fails to attend the group response session, the member's paper will not receive feedback.
Comparison/Contrast Peer Response
Here is the peer response process for the Comparison/Contrast Essay:
- On Monday, September 20, writers upload their papers to both
- GeorgiaVIEW > Discussions > Comparison/Contrast Peer Response > Group #
- GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Comparison/Contrast Essay Draft 1
- Read, take notes on, and prepare to respond to your group members' papers before the peer response time.
- GCSU/USG policy prohibits treating students differently based on wearing masks and being vaccinated, and it also prohibits social distancing. Since the majority of the class has anonymous shared that they are uncomfortable working in small groups in person under these risky conditions, and since professors are prohibited from working with students in hybrid format unless those students are quarantining or isolating, and since I promised you I would not force anyone to take a health risk that made them uncomfortable, peer response groups will meet at a location of their choosing to conduct the review workshop. Groups must tell the professor where they plan to meet by Monday, September 27; students who feel uncomfortable with the location should contact the professor. Groups are encouraged to call the professor (478.445.0964) for guidance and feedback during the peer response session at the listed times. Your peer response group will elect a secretary to record the group's collective response to the Comparison/Contrast peer response sheet for each writer. Your group will spend about 15-20 minutes reviewing each paper, providing feedback on Style and Gramma, Thesis and Controlling Idea, Comparison and Contrast, and Organization. If groups have time, you can also response to Voice, Successes and Weaknesses, and Quality and Creativity. The secretary will upload the completed sheets for each paper to GeorgiaVIEW > Discussions > Comparison/Contrast Essay > Group #.
- After your paper is reviewed by your peer response group, and before the end of class, submit a bullet point list of 3-5 things about your paper that you plan to revise, based upon your peers' feedback. Submit to your peer group's GeorgiaVIEW discussion board. Failure to submit will result in a one-third letter grade deduction off the final paper.
- If you miss the peer response session or do not read your peers' papers before the peer response session, you must complete a peer response sheet for each of your fellow group members. Failure to do so will result a one-third letter grade deduction for the final paper grade.
Wednesday, September 29, 2:00-3:40 p.m.
- Group 1: Shelby Cannon, Kimmie Galka, Matt Hamaty, Avery Hobbs, Kenzie Youngclaus (professor available 2:00-2:10, 2:50-3:00)
- Group 2: Susie Hightower, Emilia Lajewski, Meredith Robertson, Emma Rooks, Emma Talley (professor available 2:10-2:20, 3:00-3:10)
- Group 3: Anna Case, Bella Desalvo, Sierra Hart, Callie Miller, Dylan Shelnutt (professor available 2:20-2:30, 3:10-3:20)
- Group 4: Meadow Etheridge, Samantha Meeks, Brooke Mooney, Ashley Thomann, Harper Wall (professor available 2:30-2:40, 3:20-3:30)
- Group 5: Paul Bartlett, Stella Boston, Gracie Britt, Zach O’dell, Ava Thomas (professor available 2:40-2:50, 3:30-3:40)
Wednesday, September 29, 4:00-5:40 p.m.
- Group 1: Estefanie Esmerio, Caroline Johnson, Lizzy Niswonger, Isabella Oetting (professor available 4:00-4:10, 4:50-5:00)
- Group 2: Anna Durden, Caroline Hegwood, Jack Howle, Haley James (professor available 4:10-4:20, 5:00-5:10)
- Group 3: Julia Bedell, Allie Cole, Aiden Gardner, Alyssa Wright (professor available 4:20-4:30, 5:10-5:20)
- Group 4: Ellie Archer, Jacqui Banks, Sam Johnson, Marta Knapp (professor available 4:30-4:40, 5:20-5:30)
- Group 5: Taylor Bash, Jenesis Harris, Amber Hutcheson, Abbie Reynolds (professor available 4:40-4:50, 5:30-5:40)
Research Essay Peer Response
Here is the peer response process for the Research Essay:
- On Monday, November 15, writers upload their papers to both
- GeorgiaVIEW > Discussions > Research Essay Peer Response > Group #
- GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Research Essay Draft 1
- Read, take notes on, and prepare to respond to your group members' papers before the peer response time.
- GCSU/USG policy prohibits treating students differently based on wearing masks and being vaccinated, and it also prohibits social distancing. Since the majority of the class has anonymous shared that they are uncomfortable working in small groups in person under these risky conditions, and since professors are prohibited from working with students in hybrid format unless those students are quarantining or isolating, and since I promised you I would not force anyone to take a health risk that made them uncomfortable, peer response groups will meet at a location of their choosing to conduct the review workshop. Groups must tell the professor where they plan to meet by Wednesday, November 17; students who feel uncomfortable with the location should contact the professor. Groups are encouraged to call the professor (478.445.0964) for guidance and feedback during the peer response session at the listed times. Your peer response group will elect a secretary to record the group's collective response to the Research Essay peer response sheet for each writer. Your group will spend about 15-20 minutes reviewing each paper, providing feedback on Style and Gramma, Thesis and Controlling Idea, Film Analysis and Evidence, Research, and Organization. If groups have time, you can also response to Voice, Successes and Weaknesses, and Quality and Creativity. The secretary will upload the completed sheets for each paper to GeorgiaVIEW > Discussions > Research Essay > Group #.
- After your paper is reviewed by your peer response group, and before the end of class, submit a bullet point list of 3-5 things about your paper that you plan to revise, based upon your peers' feedback. Submit to your peer group's GeorgiaVIEW discussion board. Failure to submit will result in a one-third letter grade deduction off the final paper.
- If you miss the peer response session or do not read your peers' papers before the peer response session, you must complete a peer response sheet for each of your fellow group members. Failure to do so will result a one-third letter grade deduction for the final paper grade.
Monday, November 22, 2:00-3:40 p.m.
- Group 1: Kimmie Galka, Matt Hamaty, Kenzie Youngclaus (professor available 2:00-2:10, 2:50-3:00)
- Group 2: Susie Hightower, Meredith Robertson, Emma Rooks, Emma Talley (professor available 2:10-2:20, 3:00-3:10)
- Group 3: Anna Case, Bella DeSalvo, Sierra Hart, Callie Miller, Dylan Shelnutt (professor available 2:20-2:30, 3:10-3:20)
- Group 4: Meadow Etheridge, Samantha Meeks, Brooke Mooney, Ashley Thomann, Harper Wall (professor available 2:30-2:40, 3:20-3:30)
- Group 5: Paul Bartlett, Stella Boston, Gracie Britt, Zechariah O’Dell, Ava Thomas (professor available 2:40-2:50, 3:30-3:40)
Monday, November 22, 4:00-5:40 p.m.
- Group 1: Estefanie Esmerio, Caroline Johnson, Lizzy Niswonger, Isabella Oetting (professor available 4:00-4:10, 4:50-5:00)
- Group 2: Anna Durden, Caroline Hegwood, Jack Howle, Haley James (professor available 4:10-4:20, 5:00-5:10)
- Group 3: Julia Bedell, Allie Cole, Aiden Gardner, Alyssa Wright (professor available 4:20-4:30, 5:10-5:20)
- Group 4: Ellie Archer, Jacqui Banks, Sam Johnson, Marta Knapp (professor available 4:30-4:40, 5:20-5:30)
- Group 5: Taylor Bash, Jenesis Harris, Amber Hutcheson, Abbie Reynolds (professor available 4:40-4:50, 5:30-5:40)
Learning Beyond the Classroom Project
The article summary compels you to read actively and to abstract informally the key ideas from an article. The film response compels you to view actively and to respond informally to significant scenes and meanings of a film. The comparison/contrast essay requires formal, drafted, reviewed, and revised analysis of film. The learning beyond the classroom project allows you to work in small groups to apply your understanding of film in creative or critical ways beyond conventional essays. You will record your project outside of class, and we will discuss your project inside of class.
Film Option (Creative): Create a 3-5 minute horror film that applies the style and/or themes of two films studied in class. Along with the film, submit a two page explanation of how your film emulates the styles and mimics the issues of the in-class films.
Podcast Option (Critical): Record a 20-30 minute podcast episode that discusses a non-American horror film not studied in class, subject to professor approval. Be sure to address such issues as film style, film elements (shots, scene, camera, lighting, etc.), conflict, character, and theme.
Parameters
- Length: 3-5 minute film or 20-30 minute podcast
- Format: video or audio file
- Due Date: Your project is due two days before it is scheduled to be discussed in class. Submit either the file or the link to the file to two places: 1) GeorgiaVIEW > Discussions > Learning Beyond the Classroom and 2) GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Learning Beyond the Classroom Project. Note that the GeorgiaVIEW Discussions accepts audio files in either mp3 or m4a format while GeorgiaVIEW Assignments dropbox only accepts mp3; you can either convert or submit a placeholder file in docx, jpg, or txt in the Assignment dropbox.
- Group Policy: Each group member is responsible for staying connected with the group, attending meetings, actively participating in meetings, doing her delegated work, i.e., contributing her fair share to the project. In order to hold singular members accountable in a team project, each group member should individually compose and submit to GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > LBTC Project - Individual Evaluation a paragraph that assesses her own performance and her peer's service to the assignment. If it becomes apparent that a group member did not participate (skipped meetings, didn't complete her assigned work, etc.), that member will be assessed individually rather than receive the group grade.
- Grade: While you should strive to produce a watchable film or listenable podcast, your project will not be graded on artistic merit because GC2Y is not a media production course. Your project will be assessed in terms of your applied understanding of horror film style, themes, and ideas as GC2Y is a film analysis course. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Learning Beyond the Classroom Project approximately one week after you present to the class. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless you upload it to the Assignments dropbox.
Sign Up
The article summary, film response, and learning beyond the classroom project schedules are here.
Research Essay
While the first formal essay required you to compare and contrast the portrayal and themes of two films, the second formal essay involves both your own film interpretation and the integration of scholarly horror film criticism. You will research, analyze, and interpret a horror film or horror film issue in a formal, peer reviewed, and revised essay that incorporates sources from an accompanying annotated bibliography. Your interpretation of a horror film should make an overarching claim about the film or film issue, employ film analysis to prove its interpretation, and use scholarly research to support its analysis and ideas. Alternatively, you could explore an issue relevant to many horror films, analyzing a number of exemplary horror films and integrating relevant secondary sources to support the discussion. For example, you could write about the psyche of the killer in Lucio Fulci's Don't Torture a Duckling with the aide of secondary sources on Fulci films or you could write about the portrayal of gender and sexuality in gialli and use films by Dario Argento, Mario Bava, and Lucio Fulci with the aide of secondary sources on the giallo genre.
If you interpret a film, the film should be researchable, that is, you should be able to find sufficient scholarly sources that analyze the film. Because peer review of books and journals takes a couple of years, this precludes films released in the last five years and mandates the research of films that inspire scholarly criticism. You cannot research films that you wrote about in your comparison/contrast essay.
Your research should be scholarly, that is, you should find scholarly, peer reviewed journal articles, book chapters, and books using the university library's databases rather than Googling periodicals and blogs. 2:00 section students should find 15 scholarly sources to determine if your film or issue is researchable. Then, you should annotate 8 sources to determine which are the most helpful for your project. Finally, you should integrate 4 sources that help you analyze the film/issue into your 7-9 page research paper. 4:00 section students should find 15 scholarly sources, annotate 10 sources, and integrate 5 sources into the 8-10 page research paper.
Research Proposal and Source List
While the comparison/contrast essay required you to submit a thesis statement and outline, the research project necessitates that you submit a research proposal that includes both
- a paragraph that formulates your research question, issue, or idea, and
- a list of 10-15 potential sources
- The working bibliography should be styled in MLA Format and compiled using the Literary Research Methods page.
- Approximately half of the sources should be scholarly books from the GCSU and USG libraries and approximately half should be scholarly journal articles from databases like Academic Search Complete.
- While other professors might consider encyclopedias, newspapers, magazines, and website study guides to be appropriate for college level research, I deem academic books and peer reviewed journal articles the only appropriate sources for scholarly research. Therefore, you should not submit primary texts (i.e., films), encyclopedia entries, magazine articles, newspaper articles, book reviews, websites, study guides like Sparknotes and MasterPlots, or student paper mills. While you may use reputable periodicals and websites to help support the claims and analysis in your research essay, they do no not count as scholarly sources.
As good writing habit, you are encouraged to write a thesis statement and outline before drafting your paper, but you are not required to submit them for this paper. Keep in mind that you may conference with your professor at any time for direction on your project.
Annotated Bibliography
Two weeks before drafting your paper, you will submit a draft of your annotated bibliography, i.e., the research that you will use to prepare for the paper. An annotated bibliography is an MLA styled works cited list of scholarly books, book chapters, and peer-reviewed journal articles that provides a 75-100 word summary of each secondary source's argument as well as how the secondary source interprets and illuminates the meaning of the primary text, i.e., the film. Do not simply summarize the topic, provide the article's overall thesis or the article's main idea as it relates to your research question. I recommend answering the following questions:
- What question, issue, or topic is the source investigating?
- What is the source's thesis or conclusion regarding the film or film issue?
- How does the source help your understanding of the film or film issue?
2:00 section students should annotate 8 sources that could be used in the research paper; 4:00 section students should annotated 10 sources.
In terms of formatting, I using this template.
Research Essay Draft 1
Your well-organized, thesis-driven research essay should analyze film(s) using evidence from film and be supported by evidence from research sources. 2:00 section students should compose a 7-9 page essay incorporating at least 4 research sources; 4:00 section students should compose an 8-10 page essay incorporating at least 5 research sources.
Optional Paper and Annotated Bibliography Revision
Your paper will be reviewed by your peers; your paper and annotated bibliography will receive feedback and a tentative grade from your professor. You may revise your paper and annotated bibliography. If you choose to revise, you must include a revision statement (a paragraph or bullet points noting what issues you worked on in your second draft) and highlight major changes in your essay and bibliography.
Parameters
- Length
- 2:00 section: 7-9 page research paper, accompanied by an 8 source annotated bibliography (each annotation is 75-100 words)
- 4:00 sections: 8-10 page research paper, accompanied by a 10 source annotated bibliography (each annotation is 75-100 words)
- Format: Word format (I suggest using this template)
- Style: MLA style (I suggest completing this checklist)
- Due Dates: There are multiple due dates and different places to submit the paper.
- Research Proposal and Source List: The proposal and list of potential sources are due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Research Proposal on Wednesday, October 20. Failure to submit on time will result in a one-third letter grade deduction from your final research project grade.
- Annotated Bibliography: The annotated bibliography is due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Annotated Bibliography at any time on Monday, November 1.
- Research Essay Draft 1 (Professor Copy): The mandatory first draft of the paper and annotated bibliography are due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Research Paper Draft 1 at any time on Monday, November 15. Failure to submit on time will result in a one-third letter grade deduction for the final paper grade.
- Research Essay Draft 1 (Peer Copy): The mandatory first draft is also due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Discussions > Research Paper Peer Group # at any time on Monday, November 15.
- Peer Response: The mandatory peer response session will take on Monday, November 22. Failure to participate in peer response will result in a one-third letter grade deduction for the final grade of your paper.
- Research Essay Draft 2 (Professor Copy): The optional second draft of the paper and annotated bibliography, with a revision statement and highlights of major changes, are due in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Research Paper Draft 2 at any time Monday, November 29. The second draft grade will replace the first. Failure to submit a revision statement and highlighting of major changes will result in a one-third letter grade deduction for the final grade of the paper.
- Grade: Your assignment will be assessed in terms of your thesis, your film analysis and/or film issue analysis, your integration of scholarly sources, and your annotated bibliography. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Research Paper Draft 2 approximately one week after submission. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless you upload it to the Assignments dropbox.
Essay Exam
On Wednesday, November 10, both class sections opted for a take home exam. The two question essay exam will be distributed on Wednesday, December 1 and will test your knowledge and understanding of films covered on the syllabus since October, film theory covered on the syllabus since October, and film elements covered on the syllabus throughout the semester. The exam will be due on Tuesday, December 7 for students in the 2:00 section and Wednesday, December 8 for students in the 4:00 section.
Essay 1 Gender
Incorporating ideas and quotations from four different authors' articles we've read since October 4as well as three types of film evidence from three different horror films we've watched since October 4, write an essay that examines the representation of gender in horror films around the world. Your 4-5 page essay should be thesis-driven, well-organized, and formatted in MLA style.
Essay 2 Cultural Anxieties and Fears
Incorporating ideas and quotations from four different authors' articles we've read since October 4 as well as three different types of film evidence from three different horror films we've watched since October 4, write an essay that explores the cultural anxieties and fears in horror films across the world. Your 4-5 page essay should be thesis-driven, well-organized, and formatted in MLA style.
Film Articles
Each essay must quote from four different articles, for a total of eight different articles over the course of the two essay exam. Film articles include:
- Hart, "Millennial Fears: Abject Horror in a Transnational Context" (Benshoff 329-44)
- Dumas, "Horror and Psychoanalysis: An Introductory Primer" (Benshoff 21-37)
- Creed, "Horror and the Monstrous-Feminine: An Imaginary Abjection" (GeorgiaVIEW)
- Sharrett, "The Horror Film as Social Allegory (And How It Comes Undone" (Benshoff 56-72)
- Spadoni, "Carl Dreyer's Corpse: Horror Film Atmosphere and Narrative" (Benshoff 151-67)
- Humphrey, "Gender and Sexuality Haunt the Horror Film" (Benshoff 38-55)
- Freeland, "Feminist Frameworks for Horror Films" (GeorgiaVIEW)
- Hills, "Horror Reception/Audiences" (Benshoff 90-108)
- Reyes, "Body Horror" (GeorgiaVIEW)
- Hutchings, "International Horror in the 1970s" (Benshoff 292-309)
- King, "'If It's in a Word': Intersectional Feminism, Precarity, and The Babadook" (GeorgiaVIEW)
- Heffernan, "A's, B's, Quickies, Orphans, and Nasties: Horror Films in the Context of Distribution" (Benshoff 109-29)
- Hunter, "Trash Horror and the Cult of the Bad Film" (Benshoff 483-500)
- Kendrick, "Slasher Films and Gore in the 1980s" (Benshoff 310-28)
- Clover, "Her Body, Himself: Gender in the Slasher" (GeorgiaVIEW)
- Mendik, "The Return of the Rural Repressed: Italian Horror and the Mezzogiorno Giallo" (Benshoff 390-405)
- Martin, "South Korean Horror Cinema" (Benshoff 423-41)
- Alaimo, "Discomforting Creatures: Monstrous Natures in Recent Films" (GeorgiaVIEW)
- Coleman, "Introduction: Studying Blacks and Horror Films" (GeorgiaVIEW)
- Lowenstein, "Horror's Otherness and Ethnographic Surrealism: The Case of The Shout" (Benshoff 519-35)
- Ng, "Sisterhood of Terror: The Monstrous Feminine of Southeast Asian Horror Cinema" (Benshoff 442-61)
Film Elements
Each essay must discuss three different film elements, for a total of six different film elements over the course of the two essay exam. Film elements include:
- mise-en-scene: image
- mise-en-scene: camera movement
- mise-en-scene: cinematography
- editing: from shot to shot
- sound
- narrative: from scene to scene
- performance
- special effects
Films
Each essay must analyze three different films, for a total of six different films over the course of the two essay exam. Films include:
- Alien (science fiction horror, United States, 1979, 117 minutes)
- Repulsion (psychological horror, France, 1965, 105 min)
- Shivers (science fiction body horror, Canada, 1975, 87 min)
- The Babadook (psychological horror, Australia-Canada, 2014, 94 min)
- Don't Torture a Duckling (giallo, Italy, 1972, 102 min)
- The Host (monster, South Korea, 2006, 120 min)
- Nang Nak (supernatural horror, Thailand, 1999, 100 min)
Parameters
- Length: Two 4-5 page essays (8-10 pages total) with comparative thesis statements and sufficient textual support (properly introduced and explained quotes from articles, properly explained elements from specific in-class films) to prove your analysis.
- Due Date
- 2:00 section: Tuesday, December 7
- 4:00 section: Wednesday, December 8
- Grades: Your exam will be graded on the quality of your comparative theses, your understanding of film theory as demonstrated through quotation and explanation, your understanding of film elements as demonstrated through evidence from specific in-class films, and your knowledge of film issues and ideas. You can access your final grade in the course via PAWS on Wednesday, December 15. In order to read and assess all the exams and papers in my three classes by the final grade deadline, I will not be giving feedback on final projects this semester. I am glad to put your exam grade in GeorgiaVIEW > Course Work > Assignments > Exam if you ask me to do so on your exam. I am happy to provide feedback at the beginning of spring semester if you email me to set up a conference. Here's how to calculate your course grade.