Assignments
American Literary Consciousness
English 225B: American Literature I: to 1860
Winter 2007, MW 4:30-5:45PM,
121 Lake Huron Hall
In Class Activities
1. Anne Bradstreet: Faith and Family
In order to introduce ourselves to one another and commence our
discussion of Bradstreet, I've designed an short activity. Divide into groups
of 4 or 5. For 25 minutes, each group should discuss the main issues of their
assigned poem(s) and then report their findings to the class as a whole.
- Based on "The Flesh and the Spirt," "[On Deliverance]
from Another Sore Fit," and "Upon the Burning of Our House, July
10th, 1666," describe the relationship between worldly flesh and metaphysical
spirit in Bradstreet's poetry. How do worldliness and the body fit into Bradstreet's
religion?
- Based on "To My Dear and Loving Husband" and "A
Letter to Her Husband, Absent upon Public Employment," how does Bradstreet
feel about her husband? Define their relationship
and the nature of her love.
- Based on "Before the Birth of One of Her Children" and "In
Reference to Her Children, 23 June, 1659," discuss Bradstreet's
feelings toward and relationship with her children. What are the lessons
of faith and religion that she imparts to her children?
- Tease out Bradstreet's ambivalent feelings toward God and faith in her
'dead grandkid' poems, "In Memory of My Dear Grandchild Elizabeth Bradstreet" and "On
My Dear Grandchild Simon Bradstreet."
2. Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson: Revolutionary Positions
Divide into six groups. For 15 minutes, groups should develop
out and discuss the political or religious position that Paine defines in their
assigned essay.
- Group 1: In Paine's Common Sense, what is the difference between government and society?
- Group 2: What are the tory and whig positions as described in Paine's The Crisis?
- Group 3: According to Paine's The Age of Reason, what does Paine believe
in? What does he not believe in?
- Group 4: What are Jefferson's view on religion as illustrated in Notes on the State of Virginia?
- Group 5: Describe Jefferson's rebuttal to Buffon's theory of New World degeneration in Notes on the State of Virginia.
- Group 6: Describe Jefferson's view of African-Americans, slaves, and slavery in Notes on the State of Virginia.
3. Peer Response and Nathaniel Hawthorne
1. Peer Response
In the peer response meeting, group members will share their responses in
verbal form. Writers take turns listening to their group members review their
work. Specifically, the group should go around the circle and address the
issues below. The process should take 7-10 minutes per writer and last 35-50
minutes depending on the size of the group.
- Thesis: What is the paper's thesis? Does
it make a defendable claim, control the argument, and structure the paper?
- Comparison: Does the paper effectively compare and contrast
the two works?
- Anything Else: What other revisionary comments do peers have
about the paper?
2. Nathaniel Hawthorne
After completing the peer response session, the group should discuss Nathaniel
Hawthorne's "The Artist of the Beautiful" by answering the following questions,
which will jump start our large class discussion of Hawthorne after the peer
response.
- What are five key conflicts or issues in the story?
- What is the overall theme or idea of the story?
- How do the ideas conveyed by "The Artist of the Beautiful" correspond with
"Young Goodman Brown" and "The Minister's Black Veil"? How are they similar
to Emerson's worldview?
Selected Reading
The Anthology of American Literature offers much more writing by most of the authors
that we're going to read than we can possibly examine in a survey course. I
encourage you to read all of these texts, but we'll only have time to examine
a limited number of them in class. Please be prepared to discuss the following
selections.
Ralph Waldo Emerson
Nature
"The American Scholar"
"The Divinity School Address"
"Self-Reliance"
"The Poet"
Henry David Thoreau
"Civil Disobedience"
Walden, or Life in the Wood, Chapters 1-3,
5, and 18 only
"They Who Prepare My Evening Meal Below"
"On Fields o'er Which the Reaper's Hand Hass Passed"
"Smoke"
"Conscience"
"My Life Has Been the Poem"
Frederick Douglass
Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass
"Letter to His Old Master"
"What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?"
Walt Whitman
Preface to Leaves of Grass
"Song of Myself"
"To You"
"One's-Self I Sing"
"I Hear America Singing"
"Poets to Come"
"From Pent-Up Aching Rivers"
"Once I Pass'd through a Populous City"
"Crossing Brooklyn Ferry"
"Out of the Cradle Endlessly Rocking"
from Democratic Vistas
Emily Dickinson
125 [For each ecastic instant]
241 [I like a look of Agony,]
249 [Wild Nights—Wild Nights!]
258 [There's a certain Slant of light,]
303 [The Soul selects her own Society—]
324 [Some keep the Sabbath going to Church—]
341 [After great pain, a formal feeling comes—]
414 ['Twas like a Maelstrom, with a notch,]
435 [Much Madness is divinest Sense—]
441 [This is my letter to the World]
448 [This was a Poet— It is That]
650 [Pain— has an Element of Blank— ]
754 [My life had stood—a Loaded Gun—]
1129 [Tell all the truth but tell it slant—]
Study Questions
It's easy to get behind in a fast-moving survey course. In order to actively
keep up with the reading and prepare for class discussion, I suggest the following
strategy:
- Read the author biographies in the Norton anthology, for they often frame
the themes of the selected texts.
- Peruse anthology's companion website, Anthology
of American Literature.
- Take notes while you're reading, either in the margins or in a notebook
(highlighting doesn't count).
- Record at least three significant or favorite passages for each work.
- Read your peers' discussion board responses on Blackboard.
- Answer the study questions, which will typically be available the Friday
before the work will be discussed. I suggest writing a short, informal response
and citing key passages in the text that support your response.
Actively keeping up with the reading in this manner will serve you well on
the papers and exams.
Peer Response
1. Peer Response Goals
As this is Supplemental Writing Skills course, you have the opportunity
to revise your two formal papers based
upon comments by your peers and myself. You will provide constructive criticism
to 3 or 4 other members of the class as will they to you. Take this opportunity
to re-see and hone your papers, not only in terms of grammar and style but
analytical content.
- Exchange papers (formatted in Word or Rich-Text format only, not Works)
with your group via Blackboard >
Groups > Paper # - Group # > File Exchange.
- Provide me with your peer responses via Blackboard > Assignments > Paper
# Peer Response. Copy and paste all responses into one document
before submitting.
- Provide your peers with your responses by printing out all of their papers
and your response. You may also upload the response to your group page in
Blackboard if you so choose.
- Peer response grades will be placed in the the second paper draft final
grade and not in the peer response assignment dropbox. The final peer
response grade will be calculated by
averaging the peer responses from both papers.
2. Peer Response Groups
- Paper 1: Short Paper Peer Response Groups
- Group 1: Melissa Batts, Jon Gano, Shanette Haynes, James Munchow, Megan Roers
- Group 2: Chris Carver, Janice DeWit, Kristin Kolehouse, John Nichols, Abby Schmeling
- Group 3: Kristen Chaulk, Robert Gould, Danielle Lewis, Kellie Sharp,
Cory Sutherby
- Group 4: Molly Cramer, Vincent Harriger, Erica Lue, Stacy Souders,
Mark Vanderklok
- Group 5: Danielle Griffin, Erica Haveman, Erica Robinson, Iesha Stepp
- Paper 2: Research Paper Peer Response Groups
- Group 1: Melissa Batts, Chris Carver, Kristen Chaulk, Danielle Griffin, Mark Vanderklok
- Group 2: Janice DeWit, Jon Gano, Robert Gould, Erica Haveman, Stacy Souders
- Group 3: Shanette Haynes, Kristin Kolehouse, Erica Lue, Abby Schmeling, Kellie Sharp
- Group 4: Vincent Harriger, James Munchow, Erica Robinson, Iesha Stepp, Cory Sutherby
- Group 5: Molly Cramer, Danielle Lewis, John Nichols, Megan Roers
3. Written Peer Response
Answer the following questions as you formulate your one page, double-spaced
response to each peer's paper. Because these peer response papers and sessions
help your peers revise their papers and thus improve their grade, it is very
important that you offer the best constructive criticism in the strongest possible
terms, both in writing and in the group meeting. Do not simply say that a peer's
paper is okay. Even if you find no problems, engage a dialogue with the paper's
interpretation.
- Style and Grammar
- Does the paper follow the formal
and stylistic guidelines of the Modern Language Association?
Does it maintain 1-inch margins, a header, double-spacing, etc.?
Does it properly quote and cite sources?
- Mark grammatical, usage, and typographical/computer errors. However,
if they are so frequent that you're doing more marking than reading,
write a general note to the author explaining that fact.
- Thesis
- What is the writer's thesis?
- Is the thesis sufficiently complex and complicated, in other words,
does it break down general issues to their nuanced parts?
- Does the paper cut to the quick of the core conflicts and ideas of
the work of literature?
- Argument and Interpretation
- What evidence does the paper use to argue its case?
- Does the paper state more than the obvious, general reading and
make complex and sophisticated interpretations of the work?
- Does the paper convince you of its interpretation of the work of
literature? Why or why not?
- Organization
- Does each paragraph advance, support, and/or develop the controlling
thesis?
- Do the paper's paragraphs and/or sections build upon and/or follow
each other in logical, effective ways?
- Voice
- Does the paper use a formal, strong, and authoritative voice adequate
to its interpretation?
- Does the paper represent the voice of the work of literature fairly?
- Successes and Weaknesses
- Where is the paper most successful? least?
- What does it do right? Where does it need work?
- Quality and Creativity
- Is the paper of sound quality and caliber?
- Does the paper approach its text in innovative, original ways?
4. Verbal Peer Response
In the peer response meeting, group members will share their responses in
verbal form. Writers take turns listening to their group members review their
work. Specifically, the group should go around the circle and address the following
issues. The process should take 7-10 minutes per writer and last 35-50 minutes
depending on the size of the group.
- Paper 1: Short Paper
- Thesis: What is the paper's thesis or controlling idea?
- Comparison: Does the paper effectively compare and contrast the two works?
- Anything Else: What other revisionary comments do peers have
about the paper?
- Paper 2: Research Paper
- Thesis: What is the paper's thesis or controlling idea?
- Research: Does the paper effectively analyze the work while
using research to help make its case?
- Anything Else: What other revisionary comments do peers have
about the paper?
Discussion Board Response
Blackboard Post: You will respond to a reading, and post your response
to our course discussion board at Blackboard >
Discussion Board. The response should
- be formatted in Word or Rich-Text
Format (not Works) only according to the MLA
styled template,
- be 2-3 double-spaced pages long,
- show your active engagement in the text's issues (don't simply summarize
the text, tentatively analyze and interpret its meaning; if you've signed
up for a poet, feel free to closely read just one or two poems),
- help your peers understand the text by pointing out key issues, and
- broach issues for class discussion.
Informal Presentation: You will also be responsible for a brief, informal
presentation which introduces the key issues and possible themes of the text
as you see them and also broaches issues for class discussion.
Due Dates:
- Your discussion board response will be due in Blackboard > Discussion
Board on the Thursday before we
discuss an essay in class. If you do not submit your response to Blackboard
before the text is discussed in class, you will fail the assignment.
- Your brief, informal presentation will be due on the day we discuss
the reading in class. This date is approximate for we sometimes fall a day
behind.
- I will return your graded response to you in Blackboard > My
Grades
> Discussion Board Response by the next class period.
- For example, we are scheduled to discuss Bradstreet on Monday, 1-15.
Therefore, Robert Gould's summary will be due in Blackboard > Discussion
Board by Wednesday, 1-0. In class on Monday, 1-15, Robert will informally
present his reading of James' story and I will grade his response and return
it to him Blackboard > My
Grades > Discussion Board Response by Friday, 1-19.
Note: It is your responsibility to remember to post
your response on time.
Blackboard
Due Date |
Presentation
Due Date
(approximate) |
Reading |
Student |
W, 1-10 |
M, 1-15
|
Bradstreet |
|
W, 1-17
|
Taylor |
Molly Cramer |
W, 1-17 |
M, 1-22
|
Rowlandson |
Kristen Chaulk |
W, 1-24
|
Paine |
Janice DeWit |
Jefferson |
Cory Sutherby |
W, 1-24 |
M, 1-29
|
Wheatley |
Erica Haveman |
W, 1-31
|
Freneau |
Erica Robinson |
W, 1-31 |
M, 2-5
|
Irving |
Danielle Griffin |
W, 2-7
|
Bryant |
Erica Lue |
W, 2-7 |
M, 2-12
|
Emerson, Nature or "The American Scholar" |
Melissa Batts |
Emerson, "The Poet" |
John Nichols |
W, 2-14 |
M, 2-19
|
Hawthorne, "Young Goodman Brown" or
"The Minister's Black Veil" |
|
W, 2-21
|
Hawthorne, "The Artist of the Beautiful" or
"Rappaccini's Daughter" |
|
W, 2-21 |
M, 2-26
|
Fuller |
Abby Schmeling |
Child |
Stacy Souders |
W, 3-7 |
M, 3-12
|
Poe, poetry or "The Imp of the Perverse" |
Jon Gano |
W, 3-14
|
Poe, "The Fall of the House of Usher" |
Jim Munchow |
W, 3-14 |
M, 3-19
|
Melville, "Bartleby, the Scrivener" |
Mark Vanderklok |
W, 3-21
|
Melville, "Benito Cereno" |
Chris Carver |
W, 3-21 |
M, 3-26
|
Thoreau, "Civil Disobedience" |
Iesha Stepp |
Thoreau, Walden |
Shanette Haynes |
W, 3-28 |
M, 4-2
|
Douglass |
Kristin Kolehouse |
W, 4-4
|
Jacobs |
Megan Roers |
W, 4-4 |
M, 4-9
|
Whitman |
Kellie Sharp |
Vincent Harriger |
W, 4-11 |
M, 4-9
|
Dickinson |
Danielle Lewis |
Robert Gould |
Short Paper
The goal of the first paper is for you to articulate a general understanding
of an important topic within the colonial and revolutionary period of American
literature by connecting and differentiating readings. Compare and contrast
two authors (Winthrop, Bradford, Bradstreet, Taylor, Rowlandson, Paine, Jefferson,
Wheatley, Freneau) on a general topic like (but not limited to) religion, government
and revolution, savagery and slavery, by first positing a particular, comparative
yet differential and argumentative thesis and then proving that thesis with
rigorous analysis of textual evidence. As this is an SWS course, you will be
given feedback on your first draft and then allowed to revise if you so choose.
- Length: 4-6 pages
- If either your first or second draft does not meet the length requirement,
the final grade will be penalized.
- Format: MLA
style in a Word or Rich-Text Format.
- Due Dates
- Wednesday, February 14
- Draft 1 is due to me via Blackboard > Assignments > Short
Paper, Draft 1.
- Draft 1 is due to your peer response group via Blackboard >
Groups > Short Paper - Group # > File Exchange.
- Wednesday, February 21
- Electronic: Peer Responses are due to me via
Blackboard > Assignments > Short Paper Peer Response. Be sure to
attach all of the the files at once before clicking the Submit button.
- Print Out: Peer responses are due to your peers via print out
(print out the entire paper and peer response) and, if you wish, Blackboard >
Groups > Short Paper - Group # > File Exchange.
- Wednesday, February 28: Optional
- Should you choose to revise, you must include a one or two paragraph statement describing
what you learned about your first draft from your peers and professor,
what stylistic and substantive changes you made in the second draft,
and how your interpretation re-envisioned the texts in the second draft. Moreover, you must highlight your revisions using your word processing program's text highlighter. Note that revision does not automatically guarantee either a better grade or an A.
- Optional Draft 2, with revision statement and highlights, is due to
me only via Blackboard> Assignments > Short Paper, Draft
2.
Research Paper
You've explored authors and their works in study questions and class discussion.
You've come to general conclusions about the nature of the Puritan and colonial
period through your first paper. Now, you can devote an entire paper to one
Transcendentalist or mid-Nineteenth Century author, one work (Irving, Bryant,
Emerson, Hawthorne, Fuller, Child, Poe, Melville, Thoreau, Douglass). Select
a work of literature (or two or three closely related poems, or short
stories) that we've read in class. See me if you want to pursue a text not
covered. In a focused, thesis-driven paper, rigorously interpret and analyze
that piece using specific textual evidence (i.e., quotes) and literary
research (3-4 scholarly journal articles, books, or book chapters) to support
your argument. Although this is a research paper, the emphasis should be on
your ideas, your way of reading the text; the research is necesary but of secondary
importance: do not let it overwhelm your voice. I'll be glad to discuss paper
topics with you at any time.
- Length: 6-8 pages
- Your paper will be penalized one-third of a letter grade if it does
not end at least halfway down on the sixth page while implementing
12 pt Times New Roman font, double-spacing, and 1" margins. If
it does not end at least halfway down on the fifth page, it will be
penalized two-thirds of a letter grade. Since you are expected to write
a complete paper on the first draft, the length penalty will carry
over to the second draft grade
- Style: MLA style
- One-third of a letter grade will be deducted for problems in each of
the following two categories: 1) margins, 2) font size/style and line-spacing,
and 3) quoting and citing. Before you turn in a formal paper, make sure
your work follows MLA style by referring to my FAQ
on papers and using the checklist on the MLA
style handout. Correct MLA style in the second draft will void the
first draft's MLA style penalty.
- Format
- Due Dates
- Sources: Wednesday, March 28
- Submit a list of ten secondary sources you may use for the research
paper. Half must be books or book chapters; half must be scholarly
journal articles. For books and journal articles that only appear
in print, submit a photocopy of the first page of the book chapter
or journal article.
- If you do not submit your list of sources with photocopies the week
before the paper is due, then your final grade on the research paper
will be penalized one-third of a letter grade.
- Draft 1: Wednesday, April 4
- Draft 1 is due to me via Blackboard > Assignments > Research
Paper Draft 1.
- Draft 1 is due to your peer response group via Blackboard >
Groups > Research Paper - Group # > File Exchange.
- Peer Response: Wednesday, April 11
- Electronic: Peer Responses are due to me via
Blackboard > Assignments > Research Paper Peer Response. Be sure
to attach all of the the files at once before clicking the Submit button.
- Print Out: Peer responses are due to your peers via print out
(print out the entire paper and peer response) and, if you wish, Blackboard >
Groups > Research Paper - Group # > File Exchange.
- Optional Draft 2: Wednesday, April 18
- Should you choose to revise, you must include a one or two paragraph
statement describing what you learned about your first draft from your
peers and professor, what stylistic and substantive changes you made
in the second draft, and how your interpretation re-envisioned the texts
in the second draft. Moreover, you must highlight your revisions using
your word processing program's text highlighter. Note that revision does
not automatically guarantee either a better grade or an A.
- Optional Draft 2, with revision statement and highlights, is due to
me only via Blackboard > Assignments > Research Paper
Draft 2.
- Grade
- You will be assessed on your understanding of the text, your ability
to analytically interpret the text, your thesis, and your use of scholarly
criticism to support your analysis.
Student |
Author/Topic |
Melissa Batts |
Emerson |
Chris
Carver |
Melville |
Kristen
Chaulk |
Child |
Molly
Cramer |
Poe |
Janice
Dewit |
Thoreau |
Jon
Gano |
Poe |
Robert
Gould |
Emerson |
Danielle
Griffin |
Thoreau |
Vincent
Harriger |
Hawthorne |
Erica
Haveman |
Emerson |
Shanette
Haynes |
Child |
Kristin
Kolehouse |
Poe |
Danielle
Lewis |
Emerson |
Erica
Lue |
Poe |
Jim
Munchow |
Poe |
John
Nichols |
Melville |
Erica
Robinson |
Fuller |
Megan
Roers |
Poe |
Abby
Schmeling |
Fuller |
Kellie
Sharp |
Thoreau |
Stacy
Souders |
Poe |
Iesha
Stepp |
Melville |
Cory
Sutherby |
Poe |
Mark VanderKlok |
Melville |
Exam
Answer two essay questions, one from Group A and
one from Group B. Use an individual author only once and write
3-4 pages for each essay, 6-8 pages for the entire exam.
Organize essays by argument and analysis. Have a controlling idea, an interpretation,
a thesis that bridges the two authors. Support your points with textual
evidence (explanation, paraphrase, and/or quotes) but avoid plot summary.
Make complex connections and subtle distinctions between the texts; in other words, compare
and contrast the authors and their world views.
- Group A: Transcendentalism
- Transcendentalism Past: Compare and contrast one Transcendentalist
author (Emerson, Fuller, Thoreau) with one contemporary of that author
whose work exists on the periphery of Transcendentalism (Hawthorne, Poe,
Melville), is decidedly abolitionist (Douglass, Jacobs), or is influenced
by the Transcendentalists (Whitman, Dickinson).
- Transcendentalism Present: Compare and contrast one Transcendentalist
author (Emerson, Fuller, Thoreau) with one current author or work of
literature which you believe has a transcendental spirit. What is the
Transcendentalist's world view? How does the current author or text modify
Transcendentalism to work in our contemporary world?
- Group B: Themes
- Life and Death: Compare and contrast how two authors
that we’ve read since the first paper (Emerson, Hawthorne, Fuller,
Child, Fern, Harper, Poe, Melville, Thoreau, Douglass, Jacobs, Whitman,
Dickinson) approach the subject of life and death. How do they feel about
death? How do they feel about life? You could, for instance, discuss
Poe and Dickinson's
differing fascinations with death, their distinct understandings of life.
- Welcome to the Machine: We talked a lot about Thoreau
and Douglass’s views of America as system. It could be said that
both “rage against the machine,” albeit different machines.
Using two authors that we’ve read since the first paper
(Emerson, Hawthorne, Fuller, Child, Fern, Harper, Poe, Melville, Thoreau,
Douglass, Jacobs, Whitman, Dickinson), compare and contrast those authors'
reaction to the American society in terms of culture, economy, law, or
government.
- Length: 6-8 pages
- Write two essays of 3-4 pages each but do not use the same author
twice.
- Format: MLA style in Corel
WordPerfect, Microsoft
Word, Microsoft Works, OpenOffice,
or Rich-Text Format.
- Due Date: The exam is due via Blackboard > Assignments >
Exam by Wednesday, April 25. I will glady accept exams early.
- If I do not receive or cannot open your exam, I will send an email
Thursday morning. If I still do not receive or cannot open your paper
by Friday, April 27, you will automatically fail the course.
- Grades, Comments, and Paper Return:
- You will be graded on your understanding of Transcendentalism and your
ability to compare and contrast authors' world views and themes.
- You can access your final grade in the course via the Registrar after
Thursday, May 3.
- If you want comments, please ask for them. I will not return exams of those who do not request feedback. If you do request comments,
you can access your graded paper in Blackboard >My Grades > Exam
after Thursday, May 3.