Assignments
English 4110/5110 Literary Criticism
MW 3:30-4:45PM, Arts & Sciences 353, Fall 2013
In Class Activities
1. Film Analysis
Before we examine psychoanalytic film theory, we're going to study film technique. Today, you will
- divide into groups,
- review the assigned film element from the Film Analysis handout,
- watch A Trip to the Moon, and
- interpret how the film technique functions in A Trip to the Moon.
Here are the film element groups:
- mise en scène: the staging of the film
- characterization
- cinematography: film stock, lighting, and the camera
- editing
- graphics and sound
- narrative
2. Psychoanalysis and Surrealism
Before we examine psychoanalytic film theory, we're going to study the psychoanalytic theories of Sigmund Freud and Jacques Lacan and analyze how those ideas are incorporated in a surrealist film. Today, you will
- divide into groups,
- define key Freudian concepts by explaining two significant passages from the article,
- interpret how the Freudian concepts function in Luis Buñuel's Un Chien Andalou(or if your group's Freudian idea is not present in the film, an example from another film of your choosing)
- and analyze any applicable film techniques (mise en scène, characterization, cinematography, editing, graphics and sound, narrative)
Here are the article groups:
- "Repression"
- "The Unconscious" and "The Structure of the Unconscious"
- "Mourning and Melancholia" (Catherine Bowlin article summary)
- "Negation"
- "The Instincts"
- "The Theory of Dreams" (Caroline Quick article summary)
- "The Oedipus Complex" and "The Origins of Culture"
Article Summaries
The two scheduled discussion board responses serve three purposes:
- to practice responding to psychoanalytical and filmic ideas,
- to share initial understandings of the article to the discussion board the weekend before in-class discussion, and
- to practice informal presentation skills and direct class discussion.
Summarize the article's argument for approaching film, quote and explain at least two significant passages, define key terms, and include questions that the theorist would ask of film.
Parameters
- Length: 2-3 pages for the paper, 3-5 minutes for the informal presentation
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due Dates:
- The summary is due in two places in GeorgiaVIEW on the Friday before we are scheduled to discuss the text in class
- GeorgiaVIEW > Discussions > Article Summaries
- GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Article Summary 1 or 2
- The informal presentation is due on the day we are scheduled to discuss the text in class.
- If you fail to submit the summary to GeorgiaVIEW Discussions by the day before scheduled class discussion of the work, you will not be allowed to present and you will fail the assignment. It is your responsibility to note the schedule; you will not receive reminders.
- The summary is due in two places in GeorgiaVIEW on the Friday before we are scheduled to discuss the text in class
- Grades: You will be graded on your ability to summarize the main ideas of the text as well as informally present those ideas to the class. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Article Summary 1 or 2 approximately one week after you present to the class. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless and until you upload it to the Dropbox.
Sign Up
Sign up for two responses, one in slots 1-15 and one in slots 16-30. If two students sign up for a single article, you may choose to collaboratively write about and present on that essay.
GAV Date |
Article |
Student | |
---|---|---|---|
Freud, "Repression," "Unconscious," "Mourning," "Negation," |
1 Catherine Bowlin | ||
Freud, "Structure," "Instincts," "Dreams," "Oedipus " "Origins" |
2 Caroline Quick | ||
Lacan, "Letter" |
3 Owen Clark | ||
Lacan, "Mirror" |
4 Benton Meadows | ||
Heath |
5 Tess Lyle | ||
Altman |
6 Brittany Rampy | ||
Penley |
7 Katie Barfield | ||
Metz, "Story" |
8 Jodee Westbrooks | ||
Baudry |
9 Olivia Meeks | ||
Metz, "Imaginary" |
10 Tina Ng | ||
11 Rachel Smith | |||
F, 9-20 |
Doane, "Voice" |
12 Taylor Green | |
13 Megan Dent | |||
Johnson |
14 Allison Blanchard | ||
Indick, "Analyzing the Movie Dream" |
15 Alina Venick Mary Bendin |
||
Fuery, "The Limits of Knowledge" |
16 Rachel Smith | ||
Creed, "Uncanny..." |
17 Olivia Meeks | ||
Creed, "Monstrous..." |
18 Benton Meadows | ||
Mulvey |
19 Catherine Bowlin | ||
Studlar |
20 Tina Ng | ||
McGowan |
21 Owen Clark | ||
22 Allison Blanchard | |||
Žižek |
23 Brittany Rampy | ||
24 Caroline Quick Mary Bendin |
|||
Lebeau, "Daddy's..." |
25 Jodee Westbrooks | ||
Lebeau, "Feminin..." |
26 Taylor Green | ||
De Lauretis |
27 Katie Barfield | ||
28 Alina Venick | |||
Doane, "Masquerade" |
29 Tess Lyle | ||
30 Megan Dent |
Scene Analysis and Presentation
The scene analysis and presentation assignment has four goals:
- the rigorous psychoanalysis of a film scene in terms of both content and formal technique (how the scene is shot, lit, edited, and so forth, drawing on at least three film techniques exemplified in the Film Analysis handout, the as well as what the scene says about the psyche of the character[s]),
- the focused discussion of psychoanalytic film theory and interpretation outside of class,
- the collaborative process of writing, as opposed to the solitary writing practice we English majors are all so well-used to, and
- the formal presentation of the main ideas of the collaborative paper, without simply reading the essay.
Parameters
- Length: paper 5-6 pages, presentation 7-10 minutes
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due: The paper is due in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Scene Analysis and Presentation on the presentation date. Note: Due to the limitations of GeorgiaVIEW, all group members must submit the same collaboratively written paper to their individual dropboxes.
- Group Policy: Each group member is responsible for staying connected with the group, attending meetings, actively participating in meetings, doing her delegated work, i.e., contributing her fair share to the project. In order to hold singular members accountable in a team project, each group member should individually compose and submit to GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Scene Analysis and Presentation - Individual Evaluation a paragraph that assesses their own performance and their peers' service to the assignment. If it becomes apparent that a group member did not participate (skipped meetings, didn't complete her assigned work, etc.), that member will be assessed individually rather than receive the group grade.
- Grade: Your assignment will be assessed in terms of your critical application of psychoanalytic film criticism terms, your analysis of the scene, and your formal presentation. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Scene Analysis and Presentation approximately one week after you present to the class. Due to GeorgiaVIEW limitations, I cannot return your graded paper unless you upload it to the Dropbox.
Sign Up
Date | Film | Student |
---|---|---|
Benton Meadows | ||
Jodee Westbrooks | ||
Owen Clark | ||
Caroline Quick | ||
Graduate Presentation | ||
Graduate Presentation | ||
Brittany Rampy | ||
Catherine Bowlin | ||
Olivia Meeks | ||
Alina Venick | ||
Allison Blanchard | ||
Tina Ng | ||
Tess Lyle | ||
Megan Dent | ||
Mary Bendin | ||
Rachel Smith | ||
Taylor Green | ||
Katie Barfield |
Theoretical Paper
We have studied overviews of psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic film theory, primary texts of psychoanalysis, and primary texts of psychoanalytic film theory. While the scene analysis paper and presentation requires you to put theory into practice by psychoanalytically interpreting a film scene's form and content, the theoretical paper calls for you to compare and contrast how two theorists conceptualize an issue or idea in psychoanalysis or psychoanalytic film theory, and concretize the abstract correlation by discussing what the theorists would say about one of our class's films. Where and why do the two theorists' systematic understanding of the issue converge; where and why do they diverge? How would the theorists' respond to a film in our class?
For instance, you could compare and contrast how Freud and Lacan conceive of the unconscious and hypothesize what they might say about Copy Shop's protagonist's unconscious, how Baudry and Metz theorize film's imaginary function and discuss how the imaginary operates in The 400 Blows, or how Penley and Johnson envision the use of the Lacanian gaze in film in general and Film in particular.
You may consider any writer or film on the course up to September 30, not including Tyson or Allen. While your primary focus should be on developing out the two theorists' harmony and distinction, using a class film to illustrate your understanding, you may also, if you wish, set up definitions and frameworks using pertinent overviews by Tyson, Allen, Evans, and No Subject.
Parameters
- Length:
- Undergraduates: 7-9 pages
- Graduates: 9-10 pages
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due: The paper is due in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Theoretical Paper on Wednesday, October 2.
- Grade: Your assignment will be assessed in terms of your understanding of the two theorists, your comparison and contrast of the two theorists, and your practical application of theory to film. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Theoretical Paper approximately one week after you submit.
Research Paper
While the scene analysis asks undergraduates to psychoanalyze a scene's form and content, the presentation compels graduates to research, evaluate, and teach a scholarly criticism of a film, and the theoretical paper requires all to compare and contrast how two theorists conceive of a psychoanalytical idea, the research paper requires you all to analyze a film or film issue using psychoanalysis and/or psychoanalytic film theory to ground your method and scholarly film criticism to support your interpretation.
- Select a film not written about previously (it may be an outside film) or a film issue.
- Select three theoretical articles from our course but not written about in the theoretical paper.
- Research three critical articles interpreting the film (or three theoretical articles conceptualizing the film issue).
Fine print: you may also use theoretical paper articles written about in the theoretical paper, but they don't count toward the required three; you may use the same theorists from your theoretical paper but you must use different articles; as with the theoretical paper, overviews by Tyson and Allen don't count toward the three. If you are researching a film, then you should have six sources comprised of three theoretical articles from our course reading and three critical articles interpreting the film from scholarly journals and books. If you are researching an issue in film theory, then you should have six sources comprised of three in-class theoretical articles and three outside-class theoretical articles.
Your research paper should 1) make a psychoanalytic interpretation of the film or film issue, 2) exemplify its psychoanalytical methodology by integrating at least three psychoanalytic and/or psychoanalytic film theorist, and 3) support its interpretive claim by incorporating at least three scholarly articles of film criticism (or theory if researching theory).
Graduate Students
In order to prepare for giving conference presentations, graduate students only will compose a 250-word research proposal due on Monday, November 25 and present a 15-minute version of their work-in-progress to the class and answer questions on Monday, December 2, ten days before the final graduate research due date of Thursday, December 12. If warranted, graduate students should incorporate any pertinent ideas developed from the Q&A into their final essay.
Parameters
- Length:
- Undergraduates: 8-10 pages
- Graduates: 12-15 pages
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due:
- Undergraduates: GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Research Paper on Wednesday, November 20.
- Graduates: GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Research Paper on Thursday, December 12.
- 250-word abstract due on Monday, November 25
- 8-10 work-in-progress pages delivered to the class in 15-minutes of oral presentation on Monday, December 2
- Grade: Your assignment will be assessed in terms of your interpretive claim, your application of the theoretical methodology, and your practical research. Retrieve your graded assignment in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Research Paper approximately one week after you submit.
Final Exam
Undergraduate students will compose two 5-6 page essays selected from a set of 4-6 questions. We will generate topics as a class on Monday, December 2, and I will create 4-6 questions from those topics on Wednesday, December 4.
Answer two of the six questions below. Do not use an author's work or film in more than one essay; and do not repeat your theoretical or research paper topics. Not all authors' works are appropriate for all essays. Choose works which afford adequate material to address the question at hand. Have a controlling idea, an interpretation, a thesis that bridges the works. Make connections and distinctions among the texts; compare and contrast the works' key ideas. Support your points with textual evidence (pertinent quotations). Organize essays by argument and analysis. You will be graded on your understanding of psychoanalytical film theory and practical interpretation of film as well as your ability to compare and contrast meanings and issues.
Questions
- Freudian case study: Option one (character): Select two films that we've watched but you've not previously written about and write a Freudian analysis of the films' protagonists' psychological issues, then compare and contrast the results. Option two (viewer): Select two films that we've watched but you've not previously written about and write a Freudian analysis of your responses (psychological and/or interpretive) to those films, then compare and contrast the results.
- the gaze: Choose one film that we've watched but you've not previously written about and write an essay that compares and contrasts what Lacan, McGowan, and Žižek would say about the topic of the gaze in the film.
- theoretical paper, reprise: Write an essay comparing and contrasting how two theorists that we've read conceptualize an issue or idea in psychoanalysis or psychoanalytic film theory, and concretize the abstract correlation by discussing what the theorists would say about one film we've watched. Do not use your theoretical paper theorists and film; discuss new theorists and a new film.
- feminist psychoanalytic film theory: Choose one film that we've watched but you've not previously written about and write an essay that compares and contrasts what two feminist psychoanalytic film theorists that we've read might say about it, given their conceptions of women in film.
- the return of the repressed: Write an essay comparing and contrasting both cinematically (technique) and psychoanalytically (theory) how and why scenes from two films that we've watched reveal an unconscious truth.
- the psychoanalytical status of film: Select one film that we've watched but you've not previously written about and write an essay that, following Charles F. Altman's summary of psychoanalytic film theory, variously interprets the film as a 1) window or frame, 2) mirror, and 3) dream or fantasy.
Parameters
- Length: 5-6 pages per essay, 10-12 pages total
- Format: MLA style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due: GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Exam on Thursday, December 12.
- Grade: You will be graded on your understanding of psychoanalytical film theory and practical interpretation of film as well as your ability to compare and contrast meanings and issues. Retrieve your course grade in PAWS after Wednesday, December 18. If you wish to know your exam grade, please ask for it at the top of your exam, and it will be provided in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Exam by Wednesday, December 18. I am happy to provide exam feedback at the beginning of spring semester if you email me to set up a conference.
Annotated Bibliography and Presentation
Graduates students will research a film, compose an annotated bibliography of at least 10 scholarly sources interpreting the film, and teach one of the articles on the film to the class. The citations in the annotated bibliography should be formatted to MLA style, each annotation should be approximately 100 words long, and the bibliography should conclude with a one page long explanation and evaluation of why the source was selected to be taught to the class.
Parameters
- Length: 10 100-word annotated bibliographies, a 1-page explanation of the teaching selection, a 30-45 minute teaching presentation
- Format: MLA Style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due: The written component is due in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Annotated Bibliography and Presentation on the scheduled presentation date.
- Grades: You will be graded on the quality of your research, the quality of your annotations, and your presentational/teaching ability. You can retrieve your graded assignment approximately one week after your presentation in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Annotated Bibliography and Presentation.
Sign Up
Date | Film | Student |
---|---|---|
Matt Sweat |
||
Book Review
While the annotated bibliography and presentation required you to research, evaluate, and teach a work of scholarly criticism on a film, the book review compels you to read and evaluate an entire book of psychoanalytical and/or psychoanalytical film theory. Select a theorist's article from our syllabus, excluding those written about in the theoretical paper, then read either the monograph from which the article was excerpted or another book singly authored by the theorist (subject to professor approval). Write a 9-10 page essay that summarizes the book's overall theoretical claim and then evaluates that methodology. Your essay should both appreciate and interrogate the theory.
Parameters
- Length: 9-10 pages
- Format: MLA Style in Word or RTF format (I suggest using this template)
- Due: The written component is due in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Book Summary on Wednesday, November 20.
- Grades: Your assignment will be graded on its appreciative, summary understanding of the theory as well as its ability to evaluate and interrogate the book. You can retrieve your graded assignment approximately one week after submission in GeorgiaVIEW > Dropbox > Book Summary.